From: he1983912@gmail.com   
      
   You think You are smarter than someone ????????????????????????   
   HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa   
      
   *****************************************   
   Kritsjan Robam   
   Phone: (372) 5 3 9 0 0 6 6 0   
      
      
      
   Sky89 kirjutas Pühapäev, 15. juuli 2018 kl 00:42:29 UTC+2:   
   > Hello...    
   >    
   > Read this:    
   >    
   >    
   > About inferior thinking..    
   >    
   > As you have noticed i am a white arab that lives in Quebec Canada    
   > since 1989, and i am 50 years old now, i am a more serious computer    
   > programmer who has invented many scalable algorithms and there    
   > implementations and i want to sell some of my scalable algorithms    
   > to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero, now there is still    
   > an important subjet that i will get into now, it is about    
   > "inferior" thinking, because i think neo-nazism and the the political    
   > far right and nationalism are "inferior" thinking, because    
   > optimization of today is more "pragmatic", it means it is realistic,    
   > but nationalism is considered an "extremism" today that doesn't    
   > take into account the "constrains", so it is not "pragmatic"    
   > so it is inferior thinking, take for example a more open market    
   > today, as you have noticed third world countries have a    
   > high economical "growth", and they are opening there market to economic    
   > investment, so USA and Europe and Chinese and Japanese and    
   > such are economically investing in third world countries such    
   > as arab countries and african countries etc. because also of this    
   > high economic growth of third world countries, so this is a "win-win"    
   > game , this is what we call optimization of today that is pragmatism,    
   > even Israel knows about this pragmatism, and Israel also is now    
   > economically investing in many arab countries, this is why i told you    
   > more theorically that we have to give "priorities" to processes and    
   > things, and it is not a game of: i want it all ! "theorically" i have    
   > also explained that we are giving a "high" priority to "economy" and a    
   > much lesser priority to the priority of neo-nazism or nationalism that    
   > says that arabs are less beautiful and we have to discriminate them    
   > because they are less beautiful, this beautifulness is much "lesser"    
   > priority for optimization of today, so we have to know about this    
   > optimization of today and we have to be smart to "benefit" from it as    
   > i am explaining to you, this is why Israel must work with arab    
   > countries to construct better relations and a better world, other    
   > than that we have to know about the "future", an inferior thinking will    
   > say that progress of science and technology today is like "linear",    
   > but that's not the case because progress of science and technology is    
   > "exponential" and there is also the law of accelerating returns that    
   > plays an important role, this is why in about 15 years science and    
   > technology will be "really" powerful and i think in about 15 year or 20    
   > years we will also be able to enhance our "genetics", like becoming more    
   > beautiful and more smart, this is also why we have not to waste our time    
   > with inferior thinking of neo-nazism, read the rest of my following    
   > thoughts to understand better:    
   >    
   > What is the essence of reliability ?    
   >    
   > What is reliability ?    
   >    
   > We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the    
   > "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is    
   > also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the    
   > measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right    
   > "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",    
   > and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right    
   > perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be    
   > a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be    
   > able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous    
   > perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i    
   > say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is    
   > "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids    
   > "extremism" that is too violent. So it    
   > is like mathematics.    
   >    
   > What is corruption of morality ?    
   >    
   > How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?    
   >    
   > First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",    
   > so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you    
   > don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.    
   >    
   > And here is what i said before:    
   >    
   > More about morality..    
   >    
   > Philosophy is also like finding the essence of things..    
   >    
   > This is why i am finding the essence of morality..    
   >    
   > Morality can be modeled also by "reliability", because reliability    
   > do "engender" perfection, here is how:    
   >    
   > We have to be more "reliable" to be able to survive and to be able to    
   > succeed, this is a "priority" that must be fullfilled, and we have to    
   > prioritize to be able to succeed, and being reliable is being "capable"    
   > of contineous perfection towards perfection that is able to solve    
   > problems, this is why reliability can model morality and this is why    
   > reliability is morality, so as you have noticed morality can be defined    
   > by: morality is a priori pure moral inferred from reason and it is    
   > empirical moral inferred from experience, but this definition is too    
   > much abstraction that do not permit us to feel and see and understand    
   > better what is morality this is why i am doing more philosophy to find    
   > the essence of morality, and this is why i said in my previous    
   > definition that morality is:    
   >    
   > It is like philosophy that i am doing..    
   >    
   > And from where comes compassion and tolerance ?    
   >    
   > Compassion and tolerance comes from morality, because morality    
   > knows that "extremism" that is too violent inside the "set" of morality(    
   > because extremism is constrained by morality) is bad, and this rule is    
   > also inherent to our essence, and now read another time my definition of    
   > the essence of morality and you will finally understand:    
   >    
   > Here is the essence of morality:    
   >    
   > Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute    
   > perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that    
   > "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,    
   > so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it    
   > is like mathematics.    
   >    
   >    
   > Why are you so rich ?    
   >    
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)