Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.programming    |    Programming issues that transcend langua    |    57,431 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 56,095 of 57,431    |
|    Rikkur to All    |
|    Re: More of my philosophy about reverse     |
|    10 Jul 22 01:45:05    |
      From: minaoleneikeegiteine@gmail.com              Hey. Do not do reverse engineering.       Just make a program, that will do anything you write into the command input       area. Are you able to do this kind of program ? Have you tried to make it ?       Doesn't it look a good idea ? If you ask me, then I have only thought about       it, but not started to realize this, but I believe, that everything is       possible.              *******************************       ✆☎☏📱📞 : 372 53900660                     Amine Moulay Ramdane kirjutas Reede, 25. märts 2022 kl 23:27:17 UTC+2:       > Hello,        >        >        > More of my philosophy about reverse engineering..        >        > I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also        > invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..        >        >        > Simply pulling a piece of software through a decompiler does not directly       yield easily readable code for several reasons.        >        > First of all, names of variables and functions are not kept through the       compilation process, so the decompiler will assign generic names. It is much       harder to read code that looks like "f8s6ex2(i37zc, sk1eo)" than it is to read       "CalculatePrice(       articleId, amount)".        >        > Secondly, a compiler has a variety of optimization tricks that it will use       during compilation to make the code more efficient. A decompiler will return       this "optimized" code, which will look a lot less readable than the original.        >        > Just compiling the Dellhi mode of freepascal source code with optimizations       (-O2 and up) and stripping all debug and profile information, and apply       smartlinking, will make it almost        > un-decompilable. Not only FPC, but also Delphi.        >        > The level of software reverse complexity is different according to different       program languages. generally speaking, compiled language reverse engineering       is more difficult than interpreted language. in compiled languages, I think       that C++ or the Delphi        mode of Freepascal reverse engineering is the most difficult job. why? because       it is very hard to transform assembly language into high level language(C++)       or to Delphi mode of freepascal as i am also explaining above.        >        > So in reverse engineering there is almost no way to re-create the Delphi       mode of freepascal or Delphi source code from the binary.        >        >        > Thank you,        > Amine Moulay Ramdane.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca