home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.programming      Programming issues that transcend langua      57,431 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 56,095 of 57,431   
   Rikkur to All   
   Re: More of my philosophy about reverse    
   10 Jul 22 01:45:05   
   
   From: minaoleneikeegiteine@gmail.com   
      
   Hey. Do not do reverse engineering.   
   Just make a program, that will do anything you write into the command input   
   area. Are you able to do this kind of program ? Have you tried to make it ?   
   Doesn't it look a good idea ? If you ask me, then I have only thought about   
   it, but not started to realize this, but I believe, that everything is   
   possible.   
      
   *******************************   
   ✆☎☏📱📞 : 372 53900660   
      
      
   Amine Moulay Ramdane kirjutas Reede, 25. märts 2022 kl 23:27:17 UTC+2:   
   > Hello,    
   >    
   >    
   > More of my philosophy about reverse engineering..    
   >    
   > I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also    
   > invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..    
   >    
   >    
   > Simply pulling a piece of software through a decompiler does not directly   
   yield easily readable code for several reasons.    
   >    
   > First of all, names of variables and functions are not kept through the   
   compilation process, so the decompiler will assign generic names. It is much   
   harder to read code that looks like "f8s6ex2(i37zc, sk1eo)" than it is to read   
   "CalculatePrice(   
   articleId, amount)".    
   >    
   > Secondly, a compiler has a variety of optimization tricks that it will use   
   during compilation to make the code more efficient. A decompiler will return   
   this "optimized" code, which will look a lot less readable than the original.    
   >    
   > Just compiling the Dellhi mode of freepascal source code with optimizations   
   (-O2 and up) and stripping all debug and profile information, and apply   
   smartlinking, will make it almost    
   > un-decompilable. Not only FPC, but also Delphi.    
   >    
   > The level of software reverse complexity is different according to different   
   program languages. generally speaking, compiled language reverse engineering   
   is more difficult than interpreted language. in compiled languages, I think   
   that C++ or the Delphi    
   mode of Freepascal reverse engineering is the most difficult job. why? because   
   it is very hard to transform assembly language into high level language(C++)   
   or to Delphi mode of freepascal as i am also explaining above.    
   >    
   > So in reverse engineering there is almost no way to re-create the Delphi   
   mode of freepascal or Delphi source code from the binary.    
   >    
   >    
   > Thank you,    
   > Amine Moulay Ramdane.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca