From: rjh@cpax.org.uk
On 24/11/2022 1:14 pm, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Richard Heathfield writes:
>
>> On 24/11/2022 12:06 am, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>> Tim Rentsch writes:
>>>
>>>> I think this problem would make a good interview question,
>>>> provided care were taken to phrase it so the subtleties were
>>>> still there, but possible points of confusion were reduced.
>>>> Not that I know how to do that... :)
>>> I didn't make a good job of presenting it. It certainly didn't pique
>>> anyone else's interest, but then comp.programming is not well populated.
>>> One thing that struck me was that I had not come across this before. I
>>> was surprised that this was not one of those idioms that one absorbs
>>> along the way. I suppose it is of limited use.
>>
>> The trouble is that it comes across as "is y >= x and <= z?", which is
>> about as simple as it gets.
>
> I am saddened that you think I would have made a hash of that and amazed
> that you could think I had never have come across such a thing
> before. :-(
Well, of course I don't think that. But that's how it reads,
that's all. It couldn't be what you meant, but I'm not a mind reader.
> I would have thought that
>
> "Consider any ordered measure that "wraps round" -- bearings in
> degrees, minutes in the hour, indeed hours in either the 12 or 24 hour
> clock."
>
> might have suggested it was not any old start <= x < end problem.
It suggested modulo to me.
> How
> would you have phrased it so as to avoid the confusion?
That depends on what you mean, which is evidently now clear to
others, but not yet to me.
> Anyway, the take-away is that the size of the range is not part of the
> problem and that no modulo operations are involved. I found that mildly
> interesting.
Okay.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
