From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
      
   More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of   
   dialectical materialism and about scalability of productivity and more of my   
   thoughts..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i   
   have scored above 115 IQ, so i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i am   
   discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence about what is marxism and   
   communism here they are:   
      
   So i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical   
   materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process   
   of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can   
   have a “synthesis” of    
   private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you   
   can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing   
   thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that   
   marxism and communism say    
   that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating   
   correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i   
   think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i   
   also say that workers    
   living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when   
   measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio, so i   
   think that we have not to be pessimistic about the living standards that has   
   brought capitalism, and    
   of course capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of   
   growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and   
   still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, and i   
   will also talk about    
   Class struggle of Communism and Marxism by first asking the   
   following philosophical question of:   
      
   Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?   
      
   I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because   
   we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of   
   Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is   
   logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic   
   contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and   
   Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist   
   camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also   
   comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being   
   smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical   
   characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have   
   this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so   
   this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much   
   more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of   
   competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that   
   the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not   
   good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for   
   efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings   
   "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we   
   have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings   
   resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that   
   we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,   
   since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social   
   Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest   
   members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so   
   we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a   
   competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind   
   of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the   
   society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the   
   congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist   
   contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or   
   the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political   
   party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have   
   civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism   
   so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.   
      
      
   More precision of my philosophy about decentralization and about productivity   
   and about scalability and more of my thoughts..   
      
      
   Please reread my following thoughts about scalability of productivity below,   
   since i have just corrected some typos in it, so as you understand from my   
   thoughts that the how to make productivity efficiently scalable is easy for   
   me, since i am    
   understanding the how of it by discovering patterns with my fluid   
   intelligence, so i invite you to reread my thoughts:   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have   
   scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", i think i am    
   discovering other patterns with my fluid intelligence about decentralization   
   and about scalability of productivity, and it is that as i am saying below   
   about scalability of productivity, that you have to take care of the   
   "coherency", and i think that the    
   coherency is quadratic in a complexity of O(n^2), and it is not like   
   contention that is in a complexity of O(n), so it is why you have to know how   
   to decentralize efficiently so that to lower the complexity of the coherency,   
   so there is not only    
   specialization in a job in what you do better that higher productivity and   
   quality, but there is also the efficient decentralization and the efficiently   
   lowering the contention and efficiently lowering the coherency.  So notice how   
   i am replying below to    
   the PhD computer scientist about scalability of productivity, but you have to   
   know that it is inherent in my answer below that you have to take care of the   
   coherency as i am explaining above.   
      
   So read my following thoughts so that to understand my views:   
      
      
   More of my philosophy about IQ tests and more of my thoughts..   
      
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)