Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.programming    |    Programming issues that transcend langua    |    57,431 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 56,885 of 57,431    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?QXVnx51s?= to All    |
|    Re: More of my philosophy about the next    |
|    02 Jan 23 14:56:32    |
      From: angel0000000001000000000000@mail.ee              Llllllllllllllalalalllalalalalallalalalalaalaaaaaaaaaaaaallallll       llllllllllaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa                                   Amine Moulay Ramdane kirjutas Pühapäev, 1. jaanuar 2023 kl 17:12:50 UTC+2:       > Hello,        >        >        > More of my philosophy about the next GPT-4 and about ChatGPT and more of my       thoughts..        >        > I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also        > invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..        >        >        > GPT-4 is significantly larger and more powerful than GPT-3, with 170       trillion parameters compared to GPT-3’s 175 billion parameters(and even       GPT-3.5        > of the new chatGPT has 175 billion parameters). This allows GPT-4 to process       and generate text with greater accuracy and fluency, so with feedback from       users and a more powerful GPT-4 model coming up and by being trained on a       substantially larger        amount of data , ChatGPT that will use GPT-4 may "significantly" improve in       the future. So i think ChatGPT will still become much more powerful. And i       invite you to read my previous thoughts about my experience with the new       ChatGPT:        >        >        > More of my philosophy about my experience with ChatGPT and about artificial       intelligence and more of my thoughts..        >        >        > I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i       have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,        > so in those two last days i have just tested ChatGPT so that to see if        > this new artificial intelligence launched by OpenAI in November 2022 is       efficient, and i think that it is really useful, since i think by testing it       that it can score well on the human average smartness, but if you want it to       be highly smart by        inventing highly smart things , it will not be able to do it, but if you want       ChatGPT to be highly smart on what it has learned from the existing smartness       of the human knowledge that it has been trained on, i think it can also score       high in many times        of it, also ChatGPT can in many times make much less errors than humans, so i       think that ChatGPT is really useful, and i think that        > ChatGPT will be improved much more by increasing the size of        > its transformer (A transformer is a deep learning model that adopts the       mechanism of self-attention) , and i also think that ChatGPT will be        > improved much more when it will be trained on a substantially larger amount       of data, considering an article that DeepMind just published a few days ago       demonstrating that the performance of these models can be drastically improved       by scaling data more        aggressively than parameters ( Read it here: https://arxiv.org/p       f/2203.15556.pdf ), and it is        > why i am optimistic about the performance of ChatGPT and i think that it       will be much more improved.        >        >        > Thank you,        > Amine Moulay Ramdane.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca