Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.programming    |    Programming issues that transcend langua    |    57,431 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,075 of 57,431    |
|    V to Amine Moulay Ramdane    |
|    Re: More of my philosophy about quality     |
|    03 Apr 23 12:40:32    |
      From: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv11111@mail.ee              Hello, Amine Moulay Ramdane.              Regarding to Your talks of IQ and Your result >115. Do You think the       impossible(number) is not possible, let's say 301 ?       If You think this, then I tend to not trust You. Because every single thing       should be possible, that is not out of thinkability.                     Mister Kristjan Robam       Telephone: (+372) 56091196                                          On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:05:12 AM UTC+2, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:       > Hello,        >        >        > More of my philosophy about quality of free data on internet and about       artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..        >        >        > I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also        > invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..        >        >        > I think i am smart, and i will say that the tools of artificial intelligence       such as ChatGPT suffer from lower quality of the free data on internet, since       when in a system based on competition you reward people by giving them big       money, it has the        tendency to make people give high quality products and services, and it is why       i think that the quality of free data in internet that is used by ChatGPT and       the like has the tendency to be of lower quality , so it is why i think that       ChatGPT has this        tendency too.        >        >        > And i invite you to read my following previous thoughts since i have just       corrected them a little bit:        >        > Here is my new proverb about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT:        >        >        > "The most important in artificial intelligence is not to make it performant,       but it is to make it in accordance with the legal system, since if you make       artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT too much performant too much rapidly ,       it can hurt the        system and make it too much unstable, so the most important in a legal system       is to balance correctly the performance with the being stability or being       order."        >        >        > So i invite you to read my below thoughts of how to regulate ChatGPT        > so that you notice that the problem is that ChatGPT is too much performant       too much rapidly, so you have to know how to correctly balance the performance       with the being stability or being order, so here is my        > thoughts and reread them carefully so that you understand my views:        >        >        > More of my philosophy about how to regulate ChatGPT and artificial       intelligence and more of my thoughts..        >        >        >        > I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i       have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,        > so i think that OpenAI is not thinking correctly, since the ChatGPT        > is taking the patterns from the data of creativity of humans and is using       them, so i don't think that it has the right to do that, since it is "clear"       in our legal system that humans that have also created the patterns of there       creativity have not        given the rights to make an artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT with them       that can hurt humans in a not lawful way, since the value of a product or       service comes from smartness and/or from work or the hard work, but artificial       intelligence tools such        as ChatGPT are hurting in a not lawful way humans and are hurting in a not       lawful way the value of creativity of a product or service that comes from       smartness and/or work or hard work of a human, since the fact that ChatGPT       makes it much more easy to be        creative , so this also hurts the value, and i invite you to read my previous       thoughts so that to understand my views:        >        >        > More of my philosophy about the weakness of Generative Pre-trained       Transformer and more of my thoughts..        >        >        > So i think i am discovering the pattern with my fluid intelligence that        > explains the weakness of Generative Pre-trained Transformer of like ChatGPT,       and it is that ChatGPT can discover the patterns using        > the existing patterns from the data or knowledge, so it is like using        > the smartness of the data, but ChatGPT can not use the smartness of the       human brain that also comes with human consciousness that optimizes more       smartness, so it can not invent highly smart patterns or things from like is       doing it a highly smart human        from his brain, so i think that ChatGPT will still be not capable of this kind       of highly smart creativity, but still it remains really powerful and really       useful, so i invite you to read my following previous thoughts that make you       understand my views:        >        >        > More precision of my philosophy about the mechanisms of attention and       self-attention of Transformers AI models and more of my thoughts..        >        >        > I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i       have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am       understanding deep learning, but i say that Transformers are deep learning +       self-attention and        attention, and this attention and self-attention permit to grasp "context" and       "antecedents", for example when you say the following sentence:        >        >        > "The animal didn't cross the street because it was too tired"        >        >        > So we can ask how the artificial intelligence of ChatGPT that uses        > Generative Pre-trained Transformer will understand that the "it" in        > the above sentence is not the street but the animal, so i say that        > it is with self-attention and attention mechanisms of artificial       intelligence and with the training with more and more data that the       transformer can "detect" the pattern of the "it" refers to the "animal" in the       above sentence, so self-attention and        attention of the artificial intelligence of ChatGPT that we call Generative       Pre-trained Transformer permit to grasp "context" and "antecedents" too, it is       also like logically inferring the patterns using self-attention and attention       from the context of        the many many sentences from the data, and since the data is exponentially       growing and since the artificial intelligence is also generative, so i think       it will permit to make the artificial intelligence of the transformer much       more powerful, so as you        notice that the data is King , and the "generative" word of the Generative       Pre-trained Transformer refers to the model's ability to generate text, and of       course we are now noticing that it is making ChatGPT really useful and       powerful, and of course i say        that ChatGPT will still much more improve , and read my following previous       thoughts so that to understand my views about it:        >        >               [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca