Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.programming    |    Programming issues that transcend langua    |    57,431 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,102 of 57,431    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?V_=C3=B5_l_u_r?= to treetaxi    |
|    Re: Facebook killer concept    |
|    30 May 23 12:50:44    |
      From: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvva@hotmail.com              Võlumisest tead midagi ?              Saaksid võluda mulle 24 million kuldmünti sellesse ruumi, kus ma olen voodi       peale ?                            On Monday, December 3, 2012 at 5:15:30 AM UTC+2, treetaxi wrote:       > --- short rant, feel free to ignore --        > We are increasingly hearing stories of how social media is turning from        > a nice place to keep in contact with friends & family into a privacy        > destroying broadcaster of our intimate lives, vulnerable to hackers,        > open to direct marketers, and even the Federal government is trying to        > get into the act.        >        > Alternatives like Diaspora have the same Achilles heel, which I feel is        > the central server, where all our personal information and        > communications are kept under nobody-knows-what kind of security        > protocols. So I've been thinking of how the central server can be        > removed from the equation.        >        > --rant end --        >        > The basic FB account consists of a personal profile, a news-stream and        > the oft-maligned timeline. For moderate sized groups of friends        > (probably less than 100) the average desktop should be able to store        > these files locally. With updates available through some user-to-user        > method like email or IM, things like frat-party pictures or office        > griping could be shared while bypassing quasi-public venues like FB &al.        >        > I think I could hack something out myself, but it would be ugly, involve        > manual steps, and just like the only telephone in town, it wouldn't get        > any calls. So I'm broadcasting the idea to anyone that wants to give it        > a whirl.        >        > What I propose is a 4 layer protocol consisting of:        >        > Presentation<>Addressing<>[Encryption]<>Transport        >        > The presentation layer would generate a local html file for familiarity        > and a user friendly interface. It could add thumbnail pictures of        > posters, and pass user-entered comments to the next layer.        >        > The Addressing layer would use standard usenet protocols (RFC 5536) to        > add a threaded structure to conversations and (perhaps) profile-updates.        > Header information would aid in file-handling procedures for the        > presentation layer and non-text attachments.        >        > An optional encryption layer could be added using pgp/gpg methods, but        > for ease of use, keyring security would be non-interactive and therefore        > a bit lax when compared to most heavy-duty encryption programs.        >        > The transport layer might require an embedded Email, IM etc. program,        > since most communication software existing is difficult to interface to.        > 'Friends' would be whitelisted with everything else going to dev/null.        >        > ***        > I've tried to make it as open platform as possible so different programs        > can play with each other. I think it would see research and corporate        > uses as well as social media.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca