From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net   
      
   In article <106dok3$3b9ks$1@dont-email.me>,   
   Julio Di Egidio   wrote:   
   >On 30/07/2025 20:00, Dan Cross wrote:   
   >> In article <106dji3$3aqcv$1@dont-email.me>,   
   >> Julio Di Egidio   wrote:   
   >>> On 29/07/2025 14:16, Dan Cross wrote:   
   >>>> In article <106a04v$2hiar$1@dont-email.me>,   
   >>>> Julio Di Egidio   wrote:   
   >>>>> On 29/07/2025 00:18, Dan Cross wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> I'm not terribly interested in marketing slogans, to be honest.   
   >>>>>> "Safety" in this case has a very well-defined meaning, which may   
   >>>>>> not be the same as yours.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Maybe you don't realise it, but you are *only* repeating   
   >>>>> the fake history and the fraudulent marketing slogans.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Unsupported assertions coupled with a lack of engagement   
   >>>   
   >>> Or maybe you just can't read.   
   >>   
   >> Wow.  You seem nice.   
   >   
   >"Nice"??  Have you looked outside your window lately?   
   >   
   >>>> and provide data.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sure, biased data for worse than wrong models that only   
   >>> confirm themselves...   
   >>   
   >> Actually, I was suggesting that _you_ provide some data.   
   >   
   >As I did say since earlier, that very *paradigm* is a global   
   >fraud!  It's not my fault if you at best keep missing the point.   
      
   That's ridiculous.   
      
   >Indeed, do you think *you* are "nice"?  For your records, I have   
   >offended nobody, except maybe the incivilization and inculture   
   >that we/you collectively are.   
      
   You accused me of being unable to read.  That's rude, and   
   offensive.  If you don't understand that, it's really not my   
   problem.   
      
   >Sure, keep going...   
      
   No.   
      
   	- Dan C.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)