Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,703 of 14,669    |
|    Glen Herrmannsfeldt to Barry Margolin    |
|    Re: Four-way handshake?    |
|    05 Feb 09 21:07:33    |
      From: gah@ugcs.caltech.edu              Barry Margolin wrote:              > thmpsn.m.k@gmail.com wrote:       >>I'm confused: Is it possible for the "server" (the TCP that receives       >>the first SYN) to send the SYN in a segment and the ACK in another       >>segment instead of combining them in a SYN+ACK segment like it is       >>usually done?              > I don't think so. The diagram showing them separately was just       > conceptual.              Not having actually written a TCP stack, it would seem to       be confusing. The state machine would have to have an       additional state, which would otherwise not be needed or       used. If B replied with SYN first and ACK second, then       A might try to start a new connection. (The first connection,       not yet being complete, likely wouldn't be in the table       of open connections yet.)              -- glen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca