Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,952 of 14,669    |
|    Joerg to Phil Hobbs    |
|    Re: OT: The Truth About DARPA    |
|    29 Jun 09 14:21:18    |
      XPost: sci.electronics.design, comp.dsp       From: invalid@invalid.invalid              Phil Hobbs wrote:       > Tim Wescott wrote:       >> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:47:59 -0700, Le Chaud Lapin wrote:       >>       >>> Hi All,       >>>       >>> I am on the downslope of disillusionment regarding the truth of US-       >>> Government-funded research. I could pick any from a broad array of such       >>> insitutions and tell you of utterly-perplexing interactions I have had       >>> with them, but I decided to focus on DARPA, since, as we know, they were       >>> the original financial supporters of the Internet, it is claimed, and I       >>> do research with Internet protocols.       >>>       >> -- snip -->       >>> -Le Chaud Lapin-       >>       >> Because any government program is, perforce, run by bureaucrats, and       >> bureaucrats (a) never get fired for saying "no", and (b) often get       >> fired for saying "yes".       >>       >> The advantage (and I think it's there, and I think it's worth it) to       >> government-sponsored research isn't what they say it is, but it is       >> none the less manifold: it provides a pool of frustrated talent ready       >> to jump ship to productive private projects, it provides a pool of       >> mediocre researchers to teach university classes, it occasionally       >> actually results in some real advance that would never happen ever       >> with funding from the steam-engine companies, it indirectly funds       >> companies like The Math Works and efforts like open-source       >> development, and more.       >>       >> But as you so admirably point out, it doesn't meet it's _stated_ goal.       >>       >       > DARPA is actually a pretty good outfit. I've worked on DARPA projects       > at various times over the years, and the following have always been true:       >       > (1) The program managers are good technical people who Get It.       > (2) The goals are insanely ambitious, but some reasonable fraction of       > them actually get met.       >       > I've never had an engineering manager who was able to get the same level       > of commitment out of his people that DARPA gets from its grantees.       >              Most other countries on this planet don't have anything that comes even       close to DARPA but they wish they had.              --       Regards, Joerg              http://www.analogconsultants.com/              "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.       Use another domain or send PM.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca