Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,071 of 14,669    |
|    Anne & Lynn Wheeler to Rob Warnock    |
|    Re: Follow up    |
|    27 Sep 09 13:51:04    |
      From: lynn@garlic.com              rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) writes:       > Unfortunately, interest in XTP has waned markedly in recent years,       > despite the U.S. Navy's use of it for SAFENET.              part of the problem at the time was that the fed. gov. had mandates       (GOSIP) to eliminate tcp/ip and the internet and move everything to       OSI/ISO. Some number of the XTP participants were either gov. agencies       and/or other organizations that believed the GOSIP mandates.              as a result there was effort to take xtp(hsp) to x3s3.3 (ISO chartered       US standards group responsible for level 3&4 in the OSI model) for       standardization. However x3s3.3 was under ISO (charter) restrictions to       not do standardization for stuff that violated the OSI model ... and       there were various pieces of XTP/HSP that violated the OSI model (which       then precluded x3s3.3 ever really doing anything with xtp/hsp).              on the tcp/internet side ... there were lots of stuff with wide-spread       (widely deployed) commodity implementations and XTP was moving up the       value chain ... which represented some barrier on the internet side.              tcp/ip was the technology basis for the modern internet ... but the       nsfnet backbone was the operational basis for the modern internet (and       CIX was going to be the business basis for the modern internet).              we had been involved in some of the early NSFNET backbone activity as       well as doing our own highspeed backbone (copper, fiber, satellite, T1 &       higher speed). when the T1 NSFNET backbone RFP was released, internal       politics prevented us from bidding. The director of NSF wrote a letter       to the corporation (co-signed by some others), copying the CEO and       referenced wanting us involved and things like what we already had       running was at least five years ahead (possibly 20) of all RFP responses       to build something new. That just made the internal politics worse.              --       40+yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar1970              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca