From: rick.jones2@hp.com   
      
   EJP  wrote:   
   > Rick Jones wrote:   
   > > EJP  wrote:   
   > >> Rick Jones wrote:   
   > >>> ... and all but the most fanatically adhereing to RFC "SHOULD" stacks   
   > >>> allow tweaking the length of time before TCP keepalives start on an   
   > >>> idle connection.   
   > >   
   > >> ... but they generally do so as a privileged and system-wide operation,   
   > >> not a per-socket operation.   
   > >   
   > > Well... cursory web searching suggests that Linux and Solaris have at   
   > > per-socket keepalive abilities.  A quick look at the HP-UX 11iv3   
   > > (11.31) manpage for tcp suggests it has the per-socket stuff.  I've   
   > > not checked on OSX, *BSD or Aix.   
      
   > Errgh, things have changed since I were a lad ;-)   
      
   No worries, you aren't alone in having fun keeping up.  TCP used to be   
   simple and pure - just like Unix and by extension, New Jersey :)   
      
   rick jones   
   --   
   oxymoron n, commuter in a gas-guzzling luxury SUV with an American flag   
   these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)   
   feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)