Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,113 of 14,669    |
|    Mark to All    |
|    STP    |
|    15 Oct 09 09:42:55    |
      From: mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com              Hello              I have already asked this question in comp.dcom.lans.ethernet, but that       group seems to have gone dormant forever, so I'd like to try my luck in       here.              Linux kernel has its own implementation of the spanning tree, it comes along       with the 802.1d bridge functionallity. Many switch chip vendors ship their       SDK (full sources, inlcuding Linux kernel), implementing VLAN, ACL etc.       functions as well as their own implementation of spanning tree protocol.              What is the point of thadt, why not use Linux's one? Is Linux' STP not       entirely 802.1d compliant, or its architecture not enough scalable?              Thanks.              --       Mark              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca