c3d09ec1   
   From: rick.jones2@hp.com   
      
   David Schwartz  wrote:   
   > I've seen a lot of code that disables Nagle with the logic that   
   > Nagle shouldn't be doing anything anyway, and that disabling Nagle   
   > will solve performance problems if someone breaks the send   
   > logic. Frankly, I think this is backwards reasoning. If you screw up   
   > your send logic somehow, Nagle *saves* you from disaster. It's there   
   > precisely in case your send logic is busted.   
      
   Violent agreement - at least 99 times out of 10 :)   
      
   rick jones   
   --   
   a wide gulf separates "what if" from "if only"   
   these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)   
   feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)