home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.protocols.tcp-ip      TCP and IP network protocols.      14,669 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 13,256 of 14,669   
   unruh to Ramon F Herrera   
   Re: Need to keep a more robust DNS cache   
   11 Dec 09 01:07:03   
   
   f48f2f0e   
   XPost: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32, comp.os.linux.networking   
   From: unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca   
      
   ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.networking.]   
   On 2009-12-10, Ramon F Herrera  wrote:   
   >   
   > I own a minimal domain with a single Linux (web, DNS, e-mail, etc.)   
   > server.   
   >   
   > I happen to travel all over and stay in hotels in the USA and abroad   
   > which sometimes may subscribe to "el cheapo" ISPs which try to   
   > minimize the DNS queries and for some reason queries to my DNS server   
   > end up in the bit bucket or something...   
   >   
   > In order to have a more robust DNS in my Windows laptop, I would like   
   > to implement two measures:   
      
   Uh, this is a linux newgroup, not a Windows newsgroup. You would   
   probably get more useful advice on windows from a Windows newsgroup.   
      
   >   
   >  - The must be some sort of time delay to keep already resolved IP   
   > addresses in Windows, correct? How can I increase this time delay of   
   > the DNS cache?   
   >   
   >  - Back when the Internet was young (and so was I, as a sysadmin at   
   > MIT) we had to periodically download a file (/etc/hosts) which   
   > contained, believe or not, the IP addresses of all the Internet   
   > servers. That was the standard way to work, before DNS was invented.   
   > Such technique is still useful, in case DNS is not resolvong my   
   > problems :-) The question is: Where do I hardwire IP addresses in my   
   > Windows laptop? They should be used only when the regular DNS fails.   
      
   There is an equivalent of /etc/hosts on Windows. Putting the addresses   
   of your most used sites in there would  be immensely helpful in not   
   using DNS at all. hosts is almost always used before DNS-- far faster. I   
   suppose you could switch the order, but I have no idea how to do that on   
   Windows ( /etc/nsswitch on Linux)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca