XPost: comp.dsp, sci.crypt, sci.electronics.design   
   From: krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz   
      
   On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:11:52 -0800, Archimedes' Lever   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:43:06 -0600, krw  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:25:39 -0800, Archimedes' Lever   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:06:22 -0600, krw  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Real encryption is pretty cheap.  The only complication anymore is key   
   >>>>management.  No matter what you do that's a problem, so might just as   
   >>>>well make the encryption good.  Rag heads aren't the only potential   
   >>>>enemy.   
   >>>   
   >>>  Or simply change the key so often that any brute force hackers will   
   >>>fail to decrypt anything inside any effective time frame.   
   >>   
   >>...and changing keys is free (hint: key management)?  I know it's   
   >>difficult for you DimBilb but read before replying.   
   >   
   >  Actually, it is difficult for you, because it is not a public key   
   >system.   
      
   You're such a dumbshit, AlwaysWrong.  *ALL* crypto systems require key   
   management.  Indeed that's the downfall of most.  Unlike you, DimBulb,   
   key management is *not* simple.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)