Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,513 of 14,669    |
|    Torsten Robitzki to All    |
|    HTTP 1.1 keep-alive    |
|    26 May 10 22:56:14    |
      From: MyFirstname@robitzki.de              Hello,       from what I've read in RFC 2616 (http 1.1), there is neither a       keep-alive header nor a keep-alive connection-header option specified.        From three browsers I've tested, all of them send a               "Connection: keep-alive"              header and one of them send a               "Keep-alive: 115"              header. All claim to use HTTP version 1.1.              What might be the reason, why they send such headers? And what might be       the expected behaviour (especially in conjunction with the keep-alive       header) of a server? Are there any RFCs describing keep-alive with HTTP 1.1?              best regards       Torsten              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca