Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,564 of 14,669    |
|    Skybuck Flying to All    |
|    Re: Extending IPv4 with source translati    |
|    09 Sep 10 07:44:15    |
      XPost: alt.winsock.programming, comp.arch, comp.dcom.lans.ethernet       XPost: sci.crypt       From: IntoTheFuture@hotmail.com              Some furher thoughts/clearifications on this idea:              The idea assumes that at each router a modest ammount of traffic passes it.              So the idea assumes that the router will see less than half of the total ip       range go past it.              The idea would fail if 50% of the total internet ip range passes a single       router and all ip's desire privacy option.              If such hot spots exist I don't know... perhaps the amsterdam exchange...       might have routers that see more than 50% of the total ip range ?              For such hot spots this idea would fail and those routers could simply not       support it, yet it would not have to be a problem... these would       simply be the C routers as described in the example... but not because they       don't support it... but because they can't support it because       of restrictions/problems... way too many ip's are seen... In such a case the       router could fall back to "does not support privacy option" and       could slowly back off from supporting it. New request for translation are       not processed, and simply passed on to the next router as usual.              Therefore the software can check if certain conditions are present which       doesn't allow it to any longer support the privacy option and has to fall       back to normal operation. Thus the software can be fully automated and       require no inspection by administrators/service personel... and can simply       be placed into use without too much further maintenance... perhaps an       occasional check by personal to see if the privacy operation is still in       affect       or not might be usefull for them to understand what's going on with their       router and provided service to end users... it might be usefull to further       split up the network/load on routers or so...              I would expect this rare situation to be an extreme but it cannot be ruled       out especially with the growth of the internet ! ;) And the software should       be flawless and take this restriction into account so it doesn't suddenly       fail if such an extremen situation where ever to occur ! ;) :)              Bye,        Skybuck :)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca