Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,610 of 14,669    |
|    Mark Hobley to jack    |
|    Re: Path Maximum Transmission Unit Disco    |
|    27 Sep 10 09:24:36    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.networking       From: markhobley@yahoo.donottypethisbit.co              On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:20:45 +0200, jack wrote:              >       > None, if B is connected directly to C. Plenty, in the (somewhat extreme)       > case that B connects to C via routers R1, R2, and R3 with respective       > path MTUs of 1480, 1470 and 1450. B sends a 1500-byte packet; R1 splits       > it into a (1480+20). R2 splits that into (1470+10+20). R3 splits that       > into (1450+20+10+20). Now we have 4 packets, with the overhead of 3       > extra headers, that need to be re-assembled at C. And without PMTUD this       > will happen for every single packet larger than 1480.              My next question now is how likely is it that a router shunting internet       traffic has a maximum segment size of less than 1500, (before reaching       the destination network)? Is fragmentation en-route likely, or is this most       likely to start occuring on the destination LAN?              (In other words, are routers with an MSS of less than 1500 in common usage?)                            >       > -j                                          --       Mark Hobley       Linux User: #370818 http://markhobley.yi.org/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca