Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,701 of 14,669    |
|    Ersek, Laszlo to All    |
|    unconstrained address range boundaries    |
|    26 Jan 11 13:49:25    |
      From: lacos@caesar.elte.hu              Hi,              please excuse the naive question:              It is my superficial understanding that one reason of "running out of free       IPv4 addresses" is that the blocks that were issued were in part wasted on       the requestor's end, on average, because one could only obtain ranges with       powers-of-two element numbers.              What is the reason that unconstrained ranges (cutting back on waste) did       not spread wide? I believe there are efficient (as in, space & time) data       structures for the representation of intervals (nested/distinct/etc), and       for seeing which intervals contain a given element. I feel the "netmask"       concept is completely arbitrary.              Thank you,       lacos              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca