Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,718 of 14,669    |
|    Martijn Lievaart to Morten Reistad    |
|    Re: Ethernet routing to a second subnet     |
|    06 Feb 11 21:36:18    |
      XPost: comp.arch.embedded       From: m@rtij.nl.invlalid              On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:44:39 +0100, Morten Reistad wrote:              > So, if I assign [1:2:3:4::1/64] to an interface, the address       > [1:2:3:4:5::1] is assumed to be on that subnet, and you can use arp to       > get to it.              No you cannot. Arp is an IPv4 thingy, IPV6 uses multicast instead. But       otherwise your explanation is correct if we substitute either IPv4 for       IPv6, or multicast for arp.              HTH,       M4              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca