Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,726 of 14,669    |
|    Rick Jones to All    |
|    Re: Diagnose the root causing of blockin    |
|    05 Mar 11 00:03:57    |
      6d66fa5e       From: rick.jones2@hp.com              > > Every TCP socket has a TX buffer. See the tcp(7) man page and       > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem. Seems to be 16kb by default on my system.       > > It grows when you send() and shrinks when the other side ACKs that it       > > has received part of the data.              I thought that in Linux SO_SNDBUF grew when the receiver's advertised       window grew and the sending cwnd grew as well. I guess there is also       a "and is the application trying to use as much as it can" component       to the heuristic.              > > With netstat -t to see the size of the TX buffer, and with tcpdump to       > > see how well TCP is draining it.              Definitely take the tcpdump trace. Perhaps in conjunction with a       timestamped system call trace of the application making the send()       calls.              Does smell like perhaps a packet loss issue.              rick jones       --       A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.       Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?       A: Top-posting.       Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca