Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,800 of 14,669    |
|    Jorgen Grahn to Mark    |
|    Re: testing QoS with conventional PCs    |
|    07 Sep 11 07:25:12    |
      XPost: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet       From: grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se              ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.protocols.tcp-ip.]       On Wed, 2011-09-07, Mark wrote:       > Thanks everyone for input. I was rather looking for the principles of       > testing of specific QoS features, for example, I can assign a 802.1q       > priority value to a specific output queue (with low, mid or high priority).       > So, for this particular test case the question is: how, having just a couple       > of PCs and a L2 development design in between, to verify that the L2       > hardware really does what I ask it to, i.e. placing a frame with COS       > priority value 2 to TX queue 0 (as example), and a frame with COS value 7 to       > TX queue 3.       >       > (I'm trying to implement such functionality on the hardware and want to make       > sure that it does what it claims in datasheet).              That's not functionality; that's stuff that is internal to the chip,       and can only be verified by looking at its counters if it has any.              The /functionality/ would be how traffic with different COS values       affect the dropping of each other during heavy load.              I suppose you could set up something like this:               host A: addr A ----- SUT ------ addr B0 : host B        addr B1        addr B2              And add iptables rules to rewrite COS on traffic       to B0, B1 and B2.              /Jorgen              --        // Jorgen Grahn |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca