Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,866 of 14,669    |
|    Barry Margolin to wrong.defcon@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Spanning Tree Protocol - Clarificati    |
|    18 Jun 12 23:11:51    |
      From: barmar@alum.mit.edu              In article <8ce3bd34-f0e0-4a9f-a09c-b6e1bb932557@googlegroups.com>,        wrong.defcon@gmail.com wrote:              > So I have a question about Spanning Tree Protocol that I cannot find the       > answer to anywhere!              I think comp.dcom.lans would be the appropriate group, since this is       below the TCP/IP layers.              > From what I understand, switches that support STP       > exchange BPDUs to automatically configure who is the root switch and such.       > What I don't understand is how STP can protect against a situation where an       > end user plugs in both ends of the same Ethernet cable into two ports of the       > same switch.       >       > If neither end of the cable is ever plugged into a STP supported switch,       > there would be no BPDU exchange to set either of the ports to "blocking"       > mode. So traffic is passed on both of the looped ports. Right?              Probably. You shouldn't connect a switch to itself like that.              --       Barry Margolin       Arlington, MA              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca