Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,888 of 14,669    |
|    Michelot to All    |
|    Re: Carrier Ethernet    |
|    06 Oct 12 14:45:32    |
      04004b3b       XPost: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet, comp.dcom.sys.cisco       From: mhostettler@voila.fr              Hi, Mark              > they often say, for examplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier_Ethernet       > that such concepts as "bridge" or "spanning tree" don't scale well to large       > networks. What exactly is meant here by "scale" ?              Bridges are indeed used in network providers.              Spanning tree is generally not used. If the provider is adding a       bridge, STP would disrupt its network too long time, to converge.              In Ethernet WAN, we consider connectionless paths (CL) and oriented       connection paths (CO). With CO paths, address learning process is       useless.              Best regards,       Michelot              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca