From: rick.jones2@hp.com   
      
   Barry Margolin  wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   >  Rick Jones  wrote:   
      
   > > Once the send() call completes, from that point on, there is no   
   > > control (that I can think of) short of closing the socket to keep   
   > > TCP from trying to keep sending it.   
      
   > I don't think that will do it, either.  Closing the socket will   
   > continue to send everything that's buffered, and then send the FIN   
   > to indicate EOF.   
      
   Perhaps by messing about with SO_LINGER first?  Either way, that   
   isn't, I suspect, really what the OP was looking for anyway.   
      
   rick   
   --   
   The computing industry isn't as much a game of "Follow The Leader" as   
   it is one of "Ring Around the Rosy" or perhaps "Duck Duck Goose."   
                                                       - Rick Jones   
   these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)   
   feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)