home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.protocols.tcp-ip      TCP and IP network protocols.      14,669 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 14,259 of 14,669   
   herrmannsfeldt@gmail.com to Tim K   
   Re: Reverse DNS optional?   
   27 Sep 16 14:07:50   
   
   On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 2:05:51 AM UTC-7, Tim K wrote:   
   > On Monday, February 2, 2015 at 8:08:42 PM UTC-6, I wrote:   
   > > I was wondering how reverse DNS is supposed to be used.   
   > > Consider some choices:   
      
   > > A: Nobody uses it, and it is a waste of time to set up the servers.   
      
   > I'm not sure I understand ... if your network is private, you'll be using   
   >  the same servers you're using anyway. If it's public, they're your ISP's.   
      
   Well, yes, it could be the ISP. Some years, ago, I believe ATTBI, before   
   it was Comcast, I complained that the address they assigned to me   
   didn't have a reverse, and I was having problems contacting site.   
   (Many ftp sites would refuse connections.)  They fixed it.   
      
   But there are also private organizations big enough to be their   
   own ISP, or otherwise to administer a significant number of   
   publicly addressable hosts.   
      
   thanks!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca