Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 14,259 of 14,669    |
|    herrmannsfeldt@gmail.com to Tim K    |
|    Re: Reverse DNS optional?    |
|    27 Sep 16 14:07:50    |
      On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 2:05:51 AM UTC-7, Tim K wrote:       > On Monday, February 2, 2015 at 8:08:42 PM UTC-6, I wrote:       > > I was wondering how reverse DNS is supposed to be used.       > > Consider some choices:              > > A: Nobody uses it, and it is a waste of time to set up the servers.              > I'm not sure I understand ... if your network is private, you'll be using       > the same servers you're using anyway. If it's public, they're your ISP's.              Well, yes, it could be the ISP. Some years, ago, I believe ATTBI, before       it was Comcast, I complained that the address they assigned to me       didn't have a reverse, and I was having problems contacting site.       (Many ftp sites would refuse connections.) They fixed it.              But there are also private organizations big enough to be their       own ISP, or otherwise to administer a significant number of       publicly addressable hosts.              thanks!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca