Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.protocols.tcp-ip    |    TCP and IP network protocols.    |    14,669 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 14,292 of 14,669    |
|    jan.wang1989@gmail.com to All    |
|    One question about TCP FACK    |
|    04 May 17 07:15:25    |
      Hi all,       This may be simple but I just begin learning TCP deeply.       I am reading TCP FACK paper MM96(http://conferences.sigcomm.org/       igcomm/1996/papers/mathis.pdf)       and I don't quite understand below statement:              if the sender receives an ACK which advances snd.fack beyond the value of       snd.nxt at the time a segment was retransmitted (and that retransmitted       segment is otherwise unaccounted for), the sender knows that segment which was       retransmitted has been lost.              could someone give more explanation or examples, why the sender can determine       the retransmitted segment has been lost?              thanks,       Jan              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca