Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.apple2    |    Discussion about Apple II micros    |    56,720 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,454 of 56,720    |
|    D Finnigan to Garrett Meiers    |
|    Re: Anyone using a < 48K =?UTF-8?B?QXBwb    |
|    29 Apr 22 13:06:01    |
      From: dog_cow@macgui.com              Garrett Meiers wrote:       > On 4/28/22 4:33 PM, D Finnigan wrote:       >       >       >> And what about the base, 4K Apple II configuration? What did anyone       >> manage       >> to accomplish with a 4K machine? No HI-RES graphics, for sure! Anyone       >> here       >> ever use a 4K Apple?       >       > It blows my mind to think of a 4K apple II. I know they were offered       > in the beginning, but that was before they had a DOS. Can't image you'd       > be able to do much on a 4K system.       >       > I've never checked all my II's and II Pluses, to see what they are       > configured, but I suspect most of them are at least 48K.       >              Well starting around Rev 4, the RAM selector blocks were all fixed at 48K,       making it difficult to have any inferior RAM configuration. My integer Apple       II has a Rev 4 board, with a handwritten date code of 1980.              But my Apple II Plus has a Revision 3 board with removal RAM blocks. It's       dated early 1979 (if you have The New Apple II User's Guide, you have a       photo of this motherboard).              --       ]DF$       The New Apple II User's Guide:       https://macgui.com/newa2guide/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca