Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.apple2    |    Discussion about Apple II micros    |    56,720 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 56,178 of 56,720    |
|    Oliver Schmidt to And it    |
|    Re: Routine to detect CPU type (was Re:     |
|    26 May 23 10:53:22    |
      From: ol.sc@web.de              Hi Wyatt,              >It is ***YOUR*** assumption that David's BASIC code is presented as a subro=       >utine. But It does NOT mean that EVERYONE who read his message will get th=       >e SAME impression at all.              Certainly not! It is solely ******YOUR****** communication style that       causes problems - not only here, but also on FB...              The posting in question is titled 'Routine...' and consistently uses       the term 'routine', not 'program' all over the place.              And it says:              > So, after calling this routine, location 0 (and the acummulator) contain       > one of the following values:       > 0 6502       > 1 Standard 65C02       > 2 Rockwell R65C02       > 3 65802 or 65816              So it uses the term 'calling', not 'running'. Apart from that: What       sense is in a standalone program, that doesn't print its findings?              And finally it literally says:              > Here is a BASIC subroutine to implement the above routine.       > 6000 REM IDENTIFY THE PROCESSOR       > 6010 I = 800       > 6020 READ J: IF J < 0 THEN GOTO 6040       > 6030 POKE I,J: I = I + 1: GOTO 6020       > 6040 CALL 800       > 6050 CPU = PEEK(0): REM 0 = 6502, 1 = 65C02, 2 = R65C02, 3 = 65802/816       > 6060 RETURN              So it's a ******subroutine******, you see it? Just 7 lines above the       RETURN.              >I simply mentioned that changing line "6060 RETURN" into "6060 END" will NO=       >T generate error when execute the code. For those who incorporate David's c=       >ode as part of their BASIC program, they can simply ignore what I suggest.              Cartainly not! You didn't "simply mention" or "suggest" anything. You       classified the RETURN as "typo" and wrote, it "should" be an END       instead.              I strongly suggest that you take a step back from creating alternative       realities.              Thanks,       Oliver              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca