From: atari030@nomorespampleaseoptusnet.com.au   
      
   On 21/02/2010 7:06 PM, phantomm_1 wrote:   
   > "Mark Bedingfield"  wrote in   
   > message news:4b80c640$0$5422$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...   
   >> On 21/02/2010 8:29 AM, phantomm_1 wrote:   
   >>> Greetings,   
   >>>   
   >>> Are there any CT2B users out there anywhere?   
   >>>   
   >>> I was wondering if there have been any modifications,   
   >>> software or info for better performance or bug fixes if   
   >>> any have been found over the past 2years or so.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Also, of the Flashes, which version is the best to use?   
   >>>   
   >>> And are there any known problems with any of the Flashes?   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm a CT2B owner myself.   
   >>   
   >> I have one. I use the latest flash (forget which one as it would be more   
   >> than a couple of years old) it has the misfortune on my early CT2B of   
   >> restricting it to 32meg. Its a trade off, latest flash or more ram and as   
   >> 46 meg of ram appears to be enough for me, I'm not that worried.   
   >>   
   >> I only have a stock Falcon setup atm tho, which remind's me I need to   
   >> repair my screenblaster.   
   >>   
   >> Mark   
   >   
   > I didn't know that any of the Flashes had a effect of the size of FastRam!?   
   >   
   > Like to know which one, and the side effect,  crashes?   
   >   
      
   Its not the flash that effects the ram size, its the chipset. Because it   
   has an early chipset there are issues with its memory addressing. I   
   wouldn't be worried about it if I were you.   
      
   As for stability, I've struggled to keep the CT2 stable, its VERY fussy   
   about what it will and won't run. I'm not sure the reasoning behind that   
   but suspect its more mainboard related. I have a TT and another 14 meg   
   Falcon so I have plenty to experiment on ;-)   
      
   Mark   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)