From: rodxxxxx.xxuba@free.fr
Don't confuse CT2 A & CT2 B please...
Your CT2 is A, not B.
A = 32 MB max with early chip (from National Semiconductors).
B = 128 MB max with my designed chip (CPLD)
The letter is on the PCB after CT2...
Regards
Mark Bedingfield wrote:
> On 21/02/2010 7:06 PM, phantomm_1 wrote:
>> "Mark Bedingfield" wrote
>> in message news:4b80c640$0$5422$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> On 21/02/2010 8:29 AM, phantomm_1 wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>>>>
>>>> Are there any CT2B users out there anywhere?
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if there have been any modifications,
>>>> software or info for better performance or bug fixes if
>>>> any have been found over the past 2years or so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, of the Flashes, which version is the best to use?
>>>>
>>>> And are there any known problems with any of the Flashes?
>>>>
>>>> I'm a CT2B owner myself.
>>>
>>> I have one. I use the latest flash (forget which one as it would be
>>> more than a couple of years old) it has the misfortune on my early
>>> CT2B of restricting it to 32meg. Its a trade off, latest flash or
>>> more ram and as 46 meg of ram appears to be enough for me, I'm not
>>> that worried. I only have a stock Falcon setup atm tho, which remind's
>>> me I need
>>> to repair my screenblaster.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>
>> I didn't know that any of the Flashes had a effect of the size of
>> FastRam!? Like to know which one, and the side effect, crashes?
>>
>
> Its not the flash that effects the ram size, its the chipset. Because
> it has an early chipset there are issues with its memory addressing. I
> wouldn't be worried about it if I were you.
>
> As for stability, I've struggled to keep the CT2 stable, its VERY
> fussy about what it will and won't run. I'm not sure the reasoning
> behind that but suspect its more mainboard related. I have a TT and
> another 14 meg Falcon so I have plenty to experiment on ;-)
>
> Mark
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
