From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 11/29/25 16:41, Tom Elam wrote:   
   > On 11/29/2025 4:20 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >> On 11/28/25 17:49, Alan wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-11-28 13:40, Tom Elam wrote:   
   >>>> On 11/28/2025 3:38 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> BTW, Ubiquti is having a pretty good Black Friday sale going on   
   >>>>> right now if you need anything; I'm picking up their Dream Router   
   >>>>> 7; you may recall that I had been looking at it (well, the prior   
   >>>>> version) back during CoVid, but it was constantly out of stock.   
   >>>>> Figured I'd try it out, along with their G5 Pro 4K UHD webcam.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hmmm, I looked up those 2 items on Amazon and they don't seem to be   
   >>>> on sale there.   
   >>>   
   >>> Because if it's not on sale at Amazon, it can't be on sale, Asshole?   
   >>>   
   >>> For a guy who claims (implicitly) to be capable of doing research...   
   >>>   
   >>> ...you seem to be utterly clueless.   
   >>>   
   >>>    
   >>>   
   >>> Took me 30 seconds to find.   
   >>>   
   >>> Or is it that you're more interested in trying to create a "gotcha"   
   >>> moment, Asshole?   
   >>   
   >> Ding, ding, ding!   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> But since you seem to need $120 SO badly you had to wait for Black   
   >>>> Friday...   
   >>>   
   >>> Something you just made up, you mean, Asshole.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yeah, we've seen this pattern before.   
   >>   
   >> Pretty much, despite Tommy guessing correctly that Black Friday sale   
   >> advertisements were involved.  The problem with his narrative attempt   
   >> is that I wasn't the one reading the ads: they were mentioned to me.   
   >> These were a Wirecutter article for a $80 TP-Link which prompted a "do   
   >> you need a new router?" question.  Similarly, a Wyze BF email for a   
   >> <$20 security cam was: "need more cameras?" question.  Even though   
   >> everything's been okay, I took a look for opportunity's sake.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> You assume something (incorrectly) and then treat your own assumption   
   >>> as "proof" that it's correct.   
   >>   
   >> Well noted, for if there were money concerns like what Tommy always   
   >> tries to allude, the problem with that narrative attempt is why   
   >> weren't the above TP-Link & Wyze gear selected, since their cost is   
   >> ~$400 less than the UI stuff?   
   >>   
   >> BTW, card inbound ..   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   >   
   > Hugh, I'm pretty sure you do not have money issues.   
      
   Right side of Tommy's piehole, on 11/28/25 16:40:  "But since you seem   
   to need $120 SO badly you had to wait for Black Friday..."   
      
   Likewise, same piehole, on 11/28/25 10:58:  "Followup #2 ... My take is   
   that in actual reality that $120 seems to be very important to YOU.   
   Needing that for groceries or utility bills, are you?"   
      
      
   > But I am sick and tired of you implying I do.   
      
   If you're so sick & tired of discussing wealth, why is it that you're   
   invariably who brings it up?   
      
   You're always desperately trying to make you look good, and often in   
   comparison to Alan, who's ~2 decades younger than you and has had ~half   
   as many years of wealth accumulation.   
      
   > Tit-for-tat that was.   
      
   Except that your 'revenge' is invalid.   
      
   When you've pulled these dick-measuring brag attempts before, I've   
   specifically noted that your comparisons were invalid because of your   
   age difference.  You've been asked for what level of net worth would be   
   appropriate for someone who's a fraction of your age.  Did you ever   
   answer to that?  Nope.   
      
   So until you do, you're at risk of being reminded of your systematic   
   dishonesty whenever you start to try to brag about money.   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)