[continued from previous message]   
      
   > Plus even if we take off your high school gig, its still 27 years for a   
   > 16 year delta & 2.5:1 ratio.   
   >   
   > It doesn't drop to 2:1 until 1997...but just how far back does your CSMA   
   > bit on this topic go back?  Got its start date figured out yet?   
   >   
   > Point here is that very few PhD's have zero work experience prior to   
   > getting their terminal degree, including you.   
   >   
   > By your methodology of "counting", I can figuratively drop quite a few   
   > years of earnings done prior to my highest degree, which by comparison   
   > makes your wealth brag attempts even more wanting  ;-)   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > -hh   
      
   My work experience prior to 1972 contributed zero to my savings, AND we   
   do not have Alan's pre-college work record. Thus no way to compare based   
   on this flaw in your timeline. We can compare post-college. My math is   
   consistent with available data and correct.   
      
   I don't don't have a clue when it all started. According to the Google   
   Groups archive My first post was in 1997 and over 6000 posts through   
   2/22/24. You know, so tell me.   
      
   I do not doubt for one second that like millions of other people you may   
   have done better than me over a similar timeline. Heck, there are 30ish   
   year old tech billionaires out there. But that is not the comparison in   
   question.   
      
   I have posted recent images of SOME of my account balances. All we have   
   is your word for yours. Not a bit of documentation. Given your history   
   of deflection and deception your brag is worthless until proven.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)