home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.sys.mac.advocacy      Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum      120,746 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 118,987 of 120,746   
   -hh to Tom Elam   
   Re: OT: to Hugh H   
   03 Dec 25 20:05:22   
   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 12/3/25 08:49, Tom Elam wrote:   
   > On 12/2/2025 5:17 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >> Except that you've already been reminded that I don't need to lie   
   >> because the truth is invariably more devastating to you.   
   >>   
   >> Because what Tommy's trying to do is that despite how he's repeatedly   
   >> mentioned his use of MS-Excel that he's somehow never learned that   
   >> when a value is too large for a column's width, Excel uses ####'s to   
   >> indicate a display overflow.  Here, it means that that value is more   
   >> than five digits, so its a lower limit paramaterization.   
   >   
   > I'll skip the BS about claiming I might not have posted real jpg's from   
   > brokerage account.   
      
   Because you know "do as I say, not as I do" is a losing battle for you.   
      
      
   > Yes, I know all about how Excel columns work. The point is that I chose   
   > to show actual balances in actual accounts. You continue to make claims   
   > without any numerical evidence.   
      
   No, just because you posted (accidentally?) unredacted balances does not   
   create an obligation for others to make unredacted disclosures too.   
      
   I've chosen to not reveal anything new, just what I've revealed prior.   
      
   My evidence, even with some partially redacted via the #####'s, is just   
   as credible as yours.  It just better OPSEC to not give as much insight.   
      
      
   > So show us your numbers, with some details on where they are, with 7   
   > digits on the left of the decimal point.   
      
   Sorry, don't have it anymore because it was a snapshot in time of a   
   living document.  There's also zero value-added for me to try to   
   reconstruct the values just to suit your insecurity-driven whims.   
      
   > I did.   
      
   Nah, because your numbers show $1,704,517.51 to be missing.   
      
      
   > I do not recall ever saying I have done better than you financially.   
      
   Better have your memory checked by your Doctor:   
      
   June 9, 2017 at 10:39:41 PM UTC-4, Thomas E. wrote:   
   [quote]   
   So what you need to do is find a great paying job in a low cost   
   housing area. I did.   
   [quote]   
      
      
      
   July 11, 2017 at 7:14:58 PM UTC-4, Thomas E. wrote:   
   [quote]   
   If I had to live in your tiny house and in small town NJ I'd be   
   more likely to look for cheap international tickets and travel too!   
      
      
      
   Plus many threads where you've tried to brag about your vacations...   
   ...until you were compelled to reveal how many were subsidized, etc.   
      
      
   > So how do we compare?   
      
   Simple:  one chooses to not to.  As has been noted before, mere wealth   
   doesn't make one into a good person.   
      
      
   > Who cares. I don't.   
      
   Except for how your many, many, many posts on yourself & money compared   
   to others overtly prove otherwise.  Likewise, there's also been:   
      
   Jun 17, 2015, 11:18:41 PM UTC-4, Thomas E. wrote:   
   [quote]   
   Please take a 30 minute dive with 15 minutes of air.   
   [/quote]   
      
      
      
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca