XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: nobody@haph.org
Brock McNuggets
news:693196da$2$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:12:42
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> Can you please take your rants elsewhere and not use them to invade FOUR
> separate groups?
Snit, I'll make a deal with you. You apologize for writing the following
lies about me, I'll leave you to eat as much Jenkem as you like.
> I admit I often have responded to such, and my responses can be seen as
> a part of the problem. Not even saying I will never do so again, but
> unless you have something new -- something that has not been countered a
> dozen times -- please move to new material.
Writing lies about people tends to cause problems for you, Snit.
So, here's some shit you wrote about me that isn't and never was true.
When do you suppose you'll own upto what you did and apologize?
MID:
https://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Please note.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700
Lines: 112
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net P3QujyHkDb6On1S3Ju3AUAnu1dD1KlmTQH6yrHedd0nc95933I
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gShl/2fVAEVSOuI+bztI9zcX9FE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5092
On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote:
....
> Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
> for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
> you were asking about and provided you no answer.
Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past
nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Diesel
:
-----
Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out
that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else.
Just stop. That's it. Simple right?
-----
The last time the bot had posted was more than three hours before.
Diesel made it clear he could find the IP of the person running the bot.
And he made it clear it would be easy for him to make a Sandman-like
time table of posting, but showing Carroll and the bot and myself.
Was he lying when he said that? Maybe. But I do not think so. And if he
was merely lying he would not have access to the program itself, which
he makes VERY clear he did.
Diesel and Carroll were trolling together. The bot goes silent. Diesel
then says if the bot is just turned off he will let it slide. Does that
sound like Diesel to you? And he also say this:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor
example of writing software.
-----
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but
to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely
the compiled code he had:
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess:
he will NEVER say.
***
I never had a copy of the program. Nothing he's quoting that I wrote ever
supported the idea either! However! It *does show* that snit *cannot
comprehend what he reads for shit* and that is a fucking fact. Facts are
an allergy for snit. He lied his ass off, specifically about me, in that
case. That's what started the 'issue' I personally have with him.
If that's not sufficient, check the following one out. He claims I
directly lied and that David Brooks had done no such thing. Two lines,
both lies written by Snit. These aren't my personal opinions, heh, these
are actual solid facts. It's hard to argue with facts. You really are
being taken for a ride here by both of them.
MID:
From: Gremlin
Newsgroups:
alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.pol
itics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Snit lies about helping Stalker
David Brooks (again) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:28:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 99
Message-ID:
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:28:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="068b1a5346d9b021edae41f686d7558a";
logging-data="11375";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGV
kX19HznPapNIRMQ+0+xsNFEMfW5v1sDHBgDY="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b0ftxRAkxuB/uDQTbdDe6U6KgIE=
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org alt.computer.workshop:56106
comp.os.linux.advocacy:799858 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:237345
talk.politics.guns:1355046 alt.comp.os.windows-10:125024
MID:
I wrote this:
>> David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
>> with you.
And you responded with this:
> This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
Which is a problem, for you:
Message-ID: <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
From: David_B
Message-ID: <9KMYG.136546$hs5.63426@fx05.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
> I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
> weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say
> Gremlin and Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am
> sincere when I do so. And even when I am not nice in responding to
> trolling I am honest, and I try to not sink to their level.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-city-tn/computer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
