XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com   
      
   On Dec 4, 2025 at 10:00:01 PM MST, "Marian" wrote   
   <10gtosh$l9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>:   
      
   > Tyrone wrote:   
   >> But I figured -60 was low enough.   
   >   
   > Alan Baker's IQ is about 40, but the fact none of you Apple trolls have   
   > been told you're stupid your entire lives is obvious by what you post.   
   >   
   > Not one of you Apple trolls owns even close to the IQ needed for college.   
   >  Alan Baker (literally owns the IQ of about 40, i.e., a retarded person)   
   >  Alan Browne (desperately believes everything Apple tells him)   
   >  Chris (may actually own rudimentary critical-thinking skills)   
   >  Haemactylus   
   >  -hh (also shows he owns at least rudimentary cognitive skills)   
   >  Jeorg Lorenz (feels the need to respond to everything, with nothing)   
   >  JF Mezei (desperately defends Apple to the death, no matter what)   
   >  Jolly Roger (he's the most interesting canonical Apple owner of all)   
   >  Lewis (similar to Jolly Roger but not as stupid as Jolly Roger is)   
   >  nospam (almost seems he's paid to defend Apple to the death)   
   >  Tom Elam (thinks he knows something - but turns out he knows nothing)   
   >  Tyrone (actually knows Windows networking - but nothing about Apple)   
   >  Your Name (thinks he's a genius for figuring out what is never hidden)   
   >   
   > Every one of you Apple trolls owns a substandard IQ, Tyrone.   
   >  a. Mild intellectual disability: IQ around 50–70   
   >  b. Moderate intellectual disability: IQ around 35–49   
   >  c. Severe intellectual disability: IQ around 20–34   
   >  d. Profound intellectual disability: IQ below 20   
   >   
   > It's why you're Apple trolls.   
   > You believe EVERYTHING Apple feeds you to believe.   
   >   
   > And you're herd animals.   
   > Because you have no independent cognitive capacity.   
   >   
   > Being stupid herd animals is why you gloat about waiting in long lines just   
   > for the first opportunity to get rid of your existing iPhone, Tyrone.   
      
   You keep repeating the same script – accuse everyone of being stupid, paste   
   an   
   IQ chart, and hope that substitutes for an argument. It doesn’t. None of this   
   is evidence. It’s just name-calling dressed up like a psychological report.   
      
   If you actually had a point about Apple users, you’d make it. Instead,   
   you’re   
   assigning imaginary IQ scores to strangers on Usenet and calling that   
   analysis. It isn’t. You don’t know their IQs, you don’t know their   
   education,   
   and you don’t even try to address anything they’ve said. You’re just   
   recycling   
   insults.   
      
   If you want to argue about Apple hardware, software, marketing, or ecosystem   
   issues, great – bring facts. Bring examples. Bring something testable. But   
   claiming that everyone who likes Apple must have an IQ under 70 is just a   
   tantrum with a spreadsheet attached.   
      
   People buy iPhones because they prefer them. If you think they’re wrong, make   
   a case. Until then, all this talk about herd animals and fake IQ numbers is   
   just bluster with no substance behind it.   
      
   --   
   It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with   
   you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)