XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: nobody@haph.org   
      
   Charlie Glock    
   news:693258cf$3$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 05 Dec 2025 04:00:15 GMT   
   in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:   
      
   > It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.   
   > He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.   
   > Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is   
   > well respected.   
      
   I've noticed. :) I did a little quick check on the nym. Smart individual and   
   well respected as you wrote.   
      
   >   
   >>> You are one hell of a liar.   
   >>   
   >> Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him   
   >> the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and   
   >> snookered well, it's already too late.   
   >   
   > Yea.   
   > Experience is the best teacher.   
      
   It can be, it doesn't have to be. For example, One doesn't need to know what   
   an explosive device will do to them by experiencing it for themselves. In   
   those cases, experience is a hard way to learn. :)   
      
   > I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste   
   > my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin,   
   > Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and   
   > Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying   
   > and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero   
   > confirmation of his claims.   
      
   No doubt about it.   
      
   > Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding   
   > bot.   
   > Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of   
   > protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.   
   > It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve   
   > Carroll clearly said that.   
   > Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements   
   > Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. ,   
   > should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.   
   > Whoopee Einstein.   
   > The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.   
   > Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?   
   > That's snit's faulty logic in action.   
      
   Faulty logic and severe reading comprehension issues all rolled into one!   
      
   > That's how snit operates.   
   > IMHO there is nothing wrong with correcting his lies, and there are plenty   
   > to correct.   
      
   True, but, it does tend to piss some people off when it's done. I suspect,   
   but cannot confirm that they grow tired of it repeatedly happening?   
      
   > And for those of you who snit has used your real name, you have a very   
   > good legal case against snit for defamation.   
      
   Also true, but, Snit isn't in a financial position to be able to pay any   
   fees awarded. Possibly another reason he does it?   
      
   >> He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've   
   >> already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called   
   >> 'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing   
   >> with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this   
   >> for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows   
   >> what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is   
   >> all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.   
   >   
   > 100% true.   
   > The regulars in the gun groups that snit infiltrated spotted this early   
   > on.   
   > It's how snit rolls.   
      
   Without a doubt.   
      
   >> He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care   
   >> that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a   
   >> severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've   
   >> noticed that already.   
   >   
   > I've noticed that.   
   > Most of Usenet, technical discussions excepted, is about an 8th grade   
   > reading level so it's sad that snit fails so often to comprehend what he   
   > is reading and replying to.   
      
   FAS possibly? He's claimed that he suffers with it.   
      
   > And when he fucks up he rarely makes a full apology but somehow manages to   
   > drag others into his apology.   
   > It's weird.   
      
   I've seen one of his so called apologies. It didn't mention what he did or   
   who he was apologizing to. In that case it should have been to me for   
   falsely stating that I'd written a direct lie about David Brooks. Snit   
   completely avoided taking any accountability for what he wrote about me. The   
   lie he wrote about me specifically. He also didn't deal with the other lie   
   he wrote that David didn't do as I'd written. Snits reply was only two   
   fucking lines man, and he lied in both! WTF?!? :)   
      
   > It's actually hilarious when snit claims nobody can quote his lies or poor   
   > behavior.   
   > He is delusional.   
   > Whatever drugs he is taking must be quite potent.   
      
   He needs to be dealt with as one would be on a jobsite when they wanted to   
   run their mouths. That would adjust his attitude...Sometimes an individual   
   cannot learn any other way.   
      
   --   
   Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?   
   Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent   
   Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?   
   Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)