XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com   
      
   On Dec 5, 2025 at 6:11:53 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote   
   :   
      
   > Charlie Glock    
   > news:693258cf$3$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 05 Dec 2025 04:00:15 GMT   
   > in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:   
   >   
   >> It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.   
   >> He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.   
   >> Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is   
   >> well respected.   
   >   
   > I've noticed. :) I did a little quick check on the nym. Smart individual and   
   > well respected as you wrote.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>> You are one hell of a liar.   
   >>>   
   >>> Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him   
   >>> the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and   
   >>> snookered well, it's already too late.   
   >>   
   >> Yea.   
   >> Experience is the best teacher.   
   >   
   > It can be, it doesn't have to be. For example, One doesn't need to know what   
   > an explosive device will do to them by experiencing it for themselves. In   
   > those cases, experience is a hard way to learn. :)   
   >   
   >> I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste   
   >> my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin,   
   >> Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and   
   >> Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying   
   >> and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero   
   >> confirmation of his claims.   
   >   
   > No doubt about it.   
   >   
   >> Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding   
   >> bot.   
   >> Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of   
   >> protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.   
   >> It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve   
   >> Carroll clearly said that.   
   >> Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements   
   >> Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. ,   
   >> should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.   
   >> Whoopee Einstein.   
   >> The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.   
   >> Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?   
   >> That's snit's faulty logic in action.   
   >   
   > Faulty logic and severe reading comprehension issues all rolled into one!   
   >   
   >> That's how snit operates.   
   >> IMHO there is nothing wrong with correcting his lies, and there are plenty   
   >> to correct.   
   >   
   > True, but, it does tend to piss some people off when it's done. I suspect,   
   > but cannot confirm that they grow tired of it repeatedly happening?   
   >   
   >> And for those of you who snit has used your real name, you have a very   
   >> good legal case against snit for defamation.   
   >   
   > Also true, but, Snit isn't in a financial position to be able to pay any   
   > fees awarded. Possibly another reason he does it?   
   >   
   >>> He will latch onto this reply of mine and do the same thing you've   
   >>> already seen with Pothead. Feel free to check out his so called   
   >>> 'receipts' towards me - You'll find it's the same thing he's been doing   
   >>> with Pothead. He gets off on doing this shit. Eventually you'll see this   
   >>> for yourself, if you haven't already started to suspect it. He knows   
   >>> what he posts about Pothead, Steve Carroll (SC), myself, and others is   
   >>> all bullshit - it doesn't matter to him as long as a response is coming.   
   >>   
   >> 100% true.   
   >> The regulars in the gun groups that snit infiltrated spotted this early   
   >> on.   
   >> It's how snit rolls.   
   >   
   > Without a doubt.   
   >   
   >>> He baits people into responding, to call him out. He really doesn't care   
   >>> that you do. He's only interested in a response from you. He has a   
   >>> severe problem with reading comprehension as well - I suspect you've   
   >>> noticed that already.   
   >>   
   >> I've noticed that.   
   >> Most of Usenet, technical discussions excepted, is about an 8th grade   
   >> reading level so it's sad that snit fails so often to comprehend what he   
   >> is reading and replying to.   
   >   
   > FAS possibly? He's claimed that he suffers with it.   
   >   
   >> And when he fucks up he rarely makes a full apology but somehow manages to   
   >> drag others into his apology.   
   >> It's weird.   
   >   
   > I've seen one of his so called apologies. It didn't mention what he did or   
   > who he was apologizing to. In that case it should have been to me for   
   > falsely stating that I'd written a direct lie about David Brooks. Snit   
   > completely avoided taking any accountability for what he wrote about me. The   
   > lie he wrote about me specifically. He also didn't deal with the other lie   
   > he wrote that David didn't do as I'd written. Snits reply was only two   
   > fucking lines man, and he lied in both! WTF?!? :)   
   >   
   >> It's actually hilarious when snit claims nobody can quote his lies or poor   
   >> behavior.   
   >> He is delusional.   
   >> Whatever drugs he is taking must be quite potent.   
   >   
   > He needs to be dealt with as one would be on a jobsite when they wanted to   
   > run their mouths. That would adjust his attitude...Sometimes an individual   
   > cannot learn any other way.   
      
   When are you going to apologize?   
      
   --   
   It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with   
   you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)