XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com
On Dec 6, 2025 at 8:39:14 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10h2st2$35iju$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
> On 2025-12-05, Charlie Glock wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 04:59:30 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
>>
>>> Johnson
>>> news:MPG.4396d26a8f73c0b59896ba@usnews.blocknews.net Mon, 01 Dec 2025
>>> 03:15:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <692d0331$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>> Denial does not change the facts.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not denying anything.
>>>> I'm simply stating that your evidence does in no way back up your
>>>> claims.
>>>
>>> He's been told this many times by a variety of people. He ignores them
>>> all and continues to post the bullshit he calls 'evidence' or 'receipts'
>>> and he will continue doing so. It's what he does. It's part of his
>>> newsgroup destructive routine. He follows a simple concept. Repeat the
>>> bs often enough, it'll convince someone it's true.
>>
>> It didn't take Johnson long to figure out the snit troll.
>> He's dissected snit like a board certified surgeon.
>> Johnson posts in one of the Linux system admin groups frequently and is
>> well respected.
>
> That doesn't surprise me at all.
> Johnson seems intelligent, writes well without ai and figured snit out rather
> quickly which is eating at snit as he tries to recover.
> At this point snit can't put Humpty Dumpty (snit Brock) back together again
so
> he will resort to one of his one liners like boring or accusing people of
> being socks
> which is a claim snit never seems to prove.
>
>
>>
>>>> You are one hell of a liar.
>>>
>>> Some of us are well aware of this. Others have to learn this about him
>>> the hard way. By the time they realize they've been snookered, and
>>> snookered well, it's already too late.
>>
>> Yea.
>> Experience is the best teacher.
>
>
> In some cases.
> Snit's been trolling for decades and he knows how to rope people into his
> snit rodeo.
> People as a rule tend to be trusting and snit relies on that characteristic
to
> run
> his troll farm.
>
>>>> How do you live with yourself?
>>>
>>> Sadly, you're completely wasting your time. The majority of the regulars
>>> here are all well aware of him and generally ignore him. He thrives on
>>> any responses. even the negative ones. It allows him to repeat himself,
>>> ad nausem. It's the attention he seeks, good or bad, it's the attention.
>>> You're actually contributing to his efforts by calling him out. It took
>>> me a bit of time to come to this realization myself. I was warned by
>>> another new comer at the time to the newsgroup what he was actually
>>> about, but, I didn't listen to the sound advice. I engaged and defended
>>> myself. Which is exactly what Snit wanted - I was feeding him. Just as
>>> you presently are.
>>>
>>> None of snits so called 'evidence' backs his claims and they never will.
>>> He completely fabricated a story about me and then morphed what he did.
>>> At no time does he accept any responsibility for what he writes. It's
>>> always the other person. Always. You cannot reason with Snit. It's not
>>> why he's here. It's just the attention he seeks, and as long as you
>>> respond, you're giving him exactly what he wants.
>>
>> I've had some down time recently and for lack of any better way to waste
>> my time I decided to check out some of snit's claims against you, Gremlin,
>> Steve Carroll and Pothead and after thoroughly visiting the links and
>> Message ID's that snit posted it quickly became obvious that snit is lying
>> and his links by any reasonable interpretation have absolutely zero
>> confirmation of his claims.
>
> Several other posters have reached the same conclusions.
> Snit's tactic is to toss everything possible at the wall and see
> what sticks.
> So far nothing is sticking as even his supporters, all 2 of them, refuse
> to back snit.
>
>
>> Examples include his claims you had the source code to snit's flooding
>> bot.
>
> Snit's horrid reading comprehension strikes again and once snit is proved
> to be obviously wrong, instead of a polite mea culpa he will double
> down on his lies.
>
>> Steve Carroll stating the .gov site claimed snit had an order of
>> protection filed against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
>> It was pure speculation on Steve Carroll's part, a what if, and Steve
>> Carroll clearly said that.
>
> That is true.
> Someone posted a screenshot of snit's criminal harassment case.
> Others saw it while it was on the gov site before it was removed.
> Snit can deny this all he likes but the facts prove him wrong. They always
do.
>
>
>> Pothead being a racist bigot. Not even close. Snit fed list of statements
>> Pothead has made, like people who are not legal citizens of the U.S. ,
>> should not be given Medicaid, free cell phones and things like that.
>> Whoopee Einstein.
>> The vast majority of Americans believe the same thing.
>> Are they bigots and racists, white supremacists as well?
>> That's snit's faulty logic in action.
>
> Pretty much.
> Snit gets all wound up when the topic of people leeching off the government
> is broached.
> And that's because he is one of the government leeches himself.
> Snit has been scamming the US government for years.
> He refuses to work but instead expects the working taxpayers to finance him
> and his trolling.
>
>
>>
>>> Some of us have found that not directly responding to him, but
>>> discussing him, as i'm doing with you irks him to no end - to the point
>>> where other newsgroups have relieved themselves of him. If he can't get
>>> the attention and the back and forth bullshit, he pisses off -
>>> eventually. I strongly encourage you to proceed as the majority of us
>>> have been doing.
>>
>> Snit responds to me even though I rarely respond to him.
>> He is scored down in pan.
>> He seems to crave attention even when it is negative.
>> That seems obtuse to me.
>
> Snit would eat dog poop on a live stream if he was assured it would get him
> attention.
> He's basically a lunatic with serious mental problems.
>
>
>>> I'm guilty recently of having directly responded to some of his nonsense
>>> -
>>> He likes to bait people into responses by doing what you've seen him
>>> repeatedly do towards Pothead. He will continue to bait you as well. A
>>> response is what he seeks, and he'll play this game with you until you
>>> catch onto what's up and treat him as he should be - not directly
>>> responded to, but discussed amongst ourselves.
>>
>> That's how snit operates.
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
