From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 12/7/25 12:06, Tom Elam wrote:   
   > On 12/6/2025 9:11 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >> On 12/6/25 09:47, Tom Elam wrote:   
   >>> On 12/5/2025 1:36 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >>>>> LOL, it was just a partial picture. Just like yours.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Except that it clearly says "all accounts" with a total of $2.51M.   
   >>>   
   >>> Here again you jump to a bogus conclusion.   
   >>   
   >> Nope, for I'm not who posted a pic which said "All accounts".   
   >>   
   >>> That was all accounts at that one company. There are 4 of them. We   
   >>> have investments with other companies (and cash not shown) too.   
   >>> Imagine that! Apparently you cannot.   
   >>   
   >> That claim doesn't square with what your own image displayed, because   
   >> your image shows five accounts, not four.  There's the four obvious   
   >> ones, with claimed balances of $5.5K, $10.8K, $39K and $0.4K, plus   
   >> there's also "Individual Brokerage-2955" wtih $751.6K.   
   >>   
   >> Plus as I've said before, there's ~$1.7M unaccounted for because the   
   >> above five accounts sum to $807.4K, but the "All Accounts" line claims   
   >> four accounts for $2.5M:  $1,704,519 is not accounted for/undocumented.   
   >>   
   >> Hmmm...maybe there was a Photoshop job done here, eh?  /s   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> To make you happy here are all of our investment accounts:   
   >>>   
   >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UevoIJ1SUe26Zq0XadMqEpgldjtJEq3B/   
   >>> view? usp=sharing   
   >>>   
   >>> As of today, formatted just for you.   
   >>   
   >> Funny how none of the balances are even close to what you posted as   
   >> your balances on just seven days ago.   
   >>   
   >> Funny how you're guilty of YA "do as I say, not as I do"...   
   >> ...because you showed five digits, contrary to your own instructions:   
   >>   
   >> "So show us your numbers, with some details on where they are, with 7   
   >> digits on the left of the decimal point. I did."   
   >>   
   >> Plus the second brag attempt is fishy smelling too, as some lines look   
   >> like subtotals, possibly as a deception to try to encourage double-   
   >> counting.  For example, $14,186.87 is the exact sum of $7,048.54 +   
   >> $7,138.33 values listed immediately below it, as is also $54,223.21   
   >> ($26,945.97 + $27,227.24).   
   >>   
   >> Plus despite being allegedly of the same accounts, the two brags   
   >> attempts don't appear to align well:  where is the former's $39.1K   
   >> HYSA in the latter?  Did it drop by ~$12K in value in just one week?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   >   
   > LOL! You are totally confused. Score!   
      
   Tommy confesses that deception was actually his goal.   
      
   > You will never see all details, > but look at this again:   
   >   
   > https://drive.google.com/file/d/145PxsEKUioG_HkUEKF8mzkUZQx_wsZqB/view?   
   > usp=sharing   
   >   
   > The first image is a brokerage with 4 accounts. The second is a credit   
   > union snapshot with 4 accounts.   
      
   Incorrect, for you provided only one image.   
      
   That you Photoshopped multiple images together doesn't change that the   
   first says that its total is $2.511M   
      
   Nor that we can sum the four CU accounts to get $55.8K, so even if your   
   latest attempted explanation is accepted that these are in addition to   
   the prior, its a "so what?" because adding the CU's $55.8K is just a   
   minor +2% change.   
      
      
   > There are other brokerage and cash accounts.   
      
   To which we're expected to believe that while Tommy's trying to make a   
   maximal brag about himself that he chose to not include?  Does not fly.   
      
      
   > Stop trying to put is all   
   > together when you do not, and never will see, the total picture.   
      
   Yet that didn't stop you from trying to demand the total picture of   
   others...hypocrite much?   
      
      
   > Yes, the carefully redacted Excel version I downloaded from Quicken has   
   > different numbers. That is because it is investments only, not any   
   > banking numbers.   
      
   Since you've already provided what you claimed were four credit union   
   banking accounts, what sense does it make to do that?   
      
   > What you are saying is a major change in amounts is actually VERY   
   > VERY different accounts, investments not cash, with the names   
   > hidden from you. There subtotals in the Excel image.  Of course you   
   > are confused. The intent was not to inform.   
      
   Of course the intent was not to inform:  it is to try to deceive.   
   Notice how Tommy avoided acknowledging that at least two of his numbers   
   were subtotals?   
      
      
   > The only way this ever go started in the first place was you baiting   
   > with claims that I am bragging about my financial status. Honest person   
   > that I am I tried to show I'm not lying.   
      
   Just merely two deceptive documents (so far) & lying through omission:   
      
   "Throwing out misleading and irreverent numbers to impress others.   
   Bad, very bad."   
     - Tom Elam, on 12/5/25 10:10   
      
      
   > I could care less that you are among the many who have accumulated   
   > more in less time that we have.   
      
   Gosh, what a quick 180 turn, from just over a week ago, when Tommy was   
   claiming the opposite (still!):   
      
   Right side of Tommy's piehole, on 11/28/25 16:40:  "But since you seem   
   to need $120 SO badly you had to wait for Black Friday..."   
      
   Likewise, same arrogant piehole, on 11/28/25 10:58:  "Followup #2 ... My   
   take is that in actual reality that $120 seems to be very important to   
   YOU. Needing that for groceries or utility bills, are you?"   
      
      
   > Your amateurish attempts to reconcile incomplete and seemingly   
   > inconsistent data, all of which are accurate by themselves, are   
   > hilarious, never ending, and fruitless. I'm going to stop this here. You   
   > need to give it up too. You are being made a fool.   
      
   Translation:   
   Tommy knows that he's been caught (again) with his deception attempt, so   
   instead of being honest & accountable, he's going to run away (again),   
   in a futile effort to try to save face (again).  Who's the fool again?   
      
   TL;DR on all of this:  assuming minimal forgeries, Tommy's provided   
   about the best evidence seen to date that he's probably accumulated a   
   bit over $2.5M after having worked into his mid/upper-70s.  Of course,   
   the Stock Market's long Bull run over the past ~decade+ has made some   
   pretty big gains on paper for a lot of folks, both smart & dumb alike.   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)