XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: nobody@haph.org
"David B." news:mpqi7tFbb9kU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 09
Dec 2025 12:15:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:
>> Brock McNuggets wrote in
>> news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>> On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
>>> :
>>>
>>>> I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
>>>> request to the Arizona court clerk.
>>>>
>>>> So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
>>>> case information to me is that I will not share it either
>>>> electronically or physically.
>>>> I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
>>>> path.
>>>>
>>>> So here is some information taken from the document from the court
>>>> which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
>>>> against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
>>>>
>>>> 1. A screenshot of part of the document.
>>>> Take note of the case number.
>>>>
>>>> https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
>>>
>>> Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
>>>
>>> On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
>>>
>>> While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
>>> NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
>>> real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
>>>
>>> Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
>>> trivial to show the image is faked.
>>>
>>> Thanks for proving my point.
>>
>> LOL!
>> Proving your point?
>> Which one would that be?
>> Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
>> Remember that one Brock?
>>
>> the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your
>> criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
>> Yes that shows up as well.
>> Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
>>
>> Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
>> regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law.
>> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
>> You are stone cold dead in de market.
>> https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
>>
>> You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
>
>
> Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?
>
> Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?
David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is true
don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided step by step
instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the underwear of life -
you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very well known lying, obnoxious
troll, no matter how hard you try to lie and cover for him.
That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing this.
You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here with this
ruse, either, bro.
It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here that
you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his arrival. As I
told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people I greatly respect
vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet another troll that you're
responsible for bringing here.
So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be doing?
Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
--
Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?
Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent
Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?
Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
