XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
:
> "David B." news:mpqi7tFbb9kU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 09
> Dec 2025 12:15:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:
>>> Brock McNuggets wrote in
>>> news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>
>>>> On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
>>>>> request to the Arizona court clerk.
>>>>>
>>>>> So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
>>>>> case information to me is that I will not share it either
>>>>> electronically or physically.
>>>>> I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
>>>>> path.
>>>>>
>>>>> So here is some information taken from the document from the court
>>>>> which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
>>>>> against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. A screenshot of part of the document.
>>>>> Take note of the case number.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
>>>>
>>>> Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
>>>>
>>>> On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
>>>>
>>>> While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
>>>> NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
>>>> real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
>>>>
>>>> Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
>>>> trivial to show the image is faked.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for proving my point.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>> Proving your point?
>>> Which one would that be?
>>> Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
>>> Remember that one Brock?
>>>
>>> the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your
>>> criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
>>> Yes that shows up as well.
>>> Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
>>>
>>> Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
>>> regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law.
>>> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
>>> You are stone cold dead in de market.
>>> https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
>>>
>>> You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
>>
>>
>> Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?
>>
>> Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?
>
> David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is true
> don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided step by step
> instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the underwear of life -
> you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very well known lying, obnoxious
> troll, no matter how hard you try to lie and cover for him.
>
> That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing this.
> You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here with this
> ruse, either, bro.
>
> It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here that
> you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his arrival. As I
> told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people I greatly respect
> vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet another troll that you're
> responsible for bringing here.
>
> So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
> discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be doing?
> Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in being
a part of the solution?
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with
you.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
