Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,097 of 120,746    |
|    Alan to Joel W. Crump    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IMKjMjIwIOKAmGZvciBhIGN1dC    |
|    11 Dec 25 11:36:46    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2025-12-11 10:56, Joel W. Crump wrote:       > On 12/11/25 1:25 PM, Alan wrote:       >       >>>>>>>> Do you even understand that EVERY company charges whatever it       >>>>>>>> thinks the traffic will bear?       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Why is 256 GB such a prominent option? Apple is just chintzy.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> So people who need less storage SHOULDN'T be allowed to choose it?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Again: you're making a mountain out of a mole hill.       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> Not remotely. In 2021, I built my new PC with a 1 TB NVMe drive.       >>>>> Apple still wants to sell you 256 GB, today.       >>>>       >>>> You still have this ridiculous idea that:       >>>>       >>>> What works for YOU...       >>>>       >>>> ...must be what works for EVERYONE.       >>>       >>> You know why I bought a 1 TB NVMe drive? Because the old computer       >>> was upgraded from 1 TB SATA hard drive to SATA SSD. 1 TB was the       >>> gold standard. Let's say we could make that 512 GB. Why does it       >>> have to be 256, with Apple, *now in 2025*?       >>       >> Because there are people who really don't need more.       >>       >> I have quite a few clients, friends and family who will never fill a       >> 256GB drive.       >       >       > So that's good enough, for you, that some people can be good with 256,       > so Apple's just offering a good choice in that model. Inclusive to       > itself that is a good argument but it is lost when you see what the       > alternative really is, to not buy from freakin' Apple, and get the 512       > GB or 1 TB, get the 32 GB RAM, get the price one is entitled to get and       > not Apple's extortion.              No one is forcing anyone to buy Apple's products, child.              >       >       >>>>>>> Samsung PCs are one thing. But even Apple's Mac mini has the       >>>>>>> pricey upgrades of specs.       >>>>>> You're the one who touted how "grateful" you were to be a Samsung       >>>>>> user.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> And now you want to run away!       >>>>>       >>>>> I wouldn't buy a Samsung laptop. But I would a Samsung phone.       >>>       >>>> And now you pivot away from your claim of how wonderful Samsung is!       >>>       >>> Samsung is wonderful for the products I've bought from it. Apple       >>> offers me nothing.       >       >> You're the one who decided to die on the hill of Samsung being better       >> than Apple on the implied idea that they were less expensive for such       >> upgrades.       >>       >> Don't blame me that you didn't have the wit to check if the actual       >> facts matched your attempted brag.       >       >       > Samsung is better than Apple, yes, though I shy away from lambasting you       > personally with the matter, because you are a Mac user.       They're certainly no better in the one area you were implying Apple was       so bad at:              The price of upgrading from 512GB to 1TB.              Agreed?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca