Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,099 of 120,746    |
|    Alan to Joel W. Crump    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IMKjMjIwIOKAmGZvciBhIGN1dC    |
|    11 Dec 25 16:09:01    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2025-12-11 16:02, Joel W. Crump wrote:       > On 12/11/25 6:23 PM, Alan wrote:       >       >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even understand that EVERY company charges whatever       >>>>>>>>>>>> it thinks the traffic will bear?       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Why is 256 GB such a prominent option? Apple is just chintzy.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> So people who need less storage SHOULDN'T be allowed to choose       >>>>>>>>>> it?       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> Again: you're making a mountain out of a mole hill.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> Not remotely. In 2021, I built my new PC with a 1 TB NVMe       >>>>>>>>> drive. Apple still wants to sell you 256 GB, today.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> You still have this ridiculous idea that:       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> What works for YOU...       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> ...must be what works for EVERYONE.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> You know why I bought a 1 TB NVMe drive? Because the old       >>>>>>> computer was upgraded from 1 TB SATA hard drive to SATA SSD. 1       >>>>>>> TB was the gold standard. Let's say we could make that 512 GB.       >>>>>>> Why does it have to be 256, with Apple, *now in 2025*?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Because there are people who really don't need more.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I have quite a few clients, friends and family who will never fill       >>>>>> a 256GB drive.       >>>>>       >>>>> So that's good enough, for you, that some people can be good with       >>>>> 256, so Apple's just offering a good choice in that model.       >>>>> Inclusive to itself that is a good argument but it is lost when you       >>>>> see what the alternative really is, to not buy from freakin' Apple,       >>>>> and get the 512 GB or 1 TB, get the 32 GB RAM, get the price one is       >>>>> entitled to get and not Apple's extortion.       >>>>       >>>> No one is forcing anyone to buy Apple's products, child.       >>>       >>> They are, though, the cult will accept the extortion.       >>       >> Once again, you imagine that people who don't agree with you can't be       >> rational.       >       >       > You have been extorted of your money by Apple by buying a Mac or iPhone.              Nope.              Simply, unequivocally bullshit you're spouting there.              >       >       >>>>>>>>>>> Samsung PCs are one thing. But even Apple's Mac mini has the       >>>>>>>>>>> pricey upgrades of specs.       >>>>>>>>>> You're the one who touted how "grateful" you were to be a       >>>>>>>>>> Samsung user.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> And now you want to run away!       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> I wouldn't buy a Samsung laptop. But I would a Samsung phone.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> And now you pivot away from your claim of how wonderful Samsung is!       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Samsung is wonderful for the products I've bought from it. Apple       >>>>>>> offers me nothing.       >>>>>       >>>>>> You're the one who decided to die on the hill of Samsung being       >>>>>> better than Apple on the implied idea that they were less       >>>>>> expensive for such upgrades.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Don't blame me that you didn't have the wit to check if the actual       >>>>>> facts matched your attempted brag.       >>>>>       >>>>> Samsung is better than Apple, yes, though I shy away from       >>>>> lambasting you personally with the matter, because you are a Mac user.       >>>       >>>> They're certainly no better in the one area you were implying Apple       >>>> was so bad at:       >>>>       >>>> The price of upgrading from 512GB to 1TB.       >>>>       >>>> Agreed?       >>>       >>> It shouldn't be hundreds upon hundreds, of dollars.       >       >> But it is...       >>       >> ...75% MORE expensive from Samsung...       >>       >> ...the company you CHOSE to compare Apple against.       >       >       > What I see on samsung.com tells me that proprietary devices are       > prohibitively expensive. Which of the two companies has a walled       > garden, though?       Drag those goalposts!              Did you imply that Apple charged more for such upgrades than Samsung does?              Yes or no.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca