XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration   
   From: jda@none.here   
      
   In 12 months Trump has accomplished nothing.  All the lying faggot-in-chief   
   does all day is spout insane lies to gullible followers.   Feeble and old,   
   he can't even manage to stay awake for meetings.   
      
   The top 10 negative accomplishments of donald trump's second presidential   
   term   
   Checked on December 2, 2025   
      
   The White House   
   Good News You May Have Missed: Everyday Proof the Trump Agenda Is   
   Delivering  The White House   
   Gallup   
   Trump's Approval Rating Drops to 36%, New Second-Term Low   
   The Guardian   
   Trumps second term will be the worst presidential term ever | Steven   
   Greenhouse | The Guardian   
   The Atlantic   
   Donald Trumps Plan to Subvert the Midterms Is Already Under Way - The   
   Atlantic   
      
      
      
   Executive summary   
      
   Donald Trumps second term has already generated sharp public criticism and   
   falling approval: Gallup reports his job approval fell to 36% with 60%   
   disapproval [1], and multiple polls show sustained secondterm lows and   
   broad public concern about his governance and use of executive power [2]   
   [3]. Opinion writers and analysts frame his return as aggressive and   
   potentially authoritarian for which he will pay dearly.   
      
   1. A collapsing popularity score that fuels political peril   
      
   Trumps approval ratings have declined to new secondterm lows in multiple   
   surveys: Gallup puts approval at 36% with 60% disapproval [1],   
   Reuters/Ipsos and other poll aggregates show similarly weak numbers cited   
   by Newsweek and Forbes [2] [6]. Lower approval narrows political   
   maneuvering room and is the most quantifiable negative outcome of his   
   return so far [1] [2].   
      
   2. Worries about executive overreach and governance by fiat   
      
   Independent polling finds a majority of Americans say Trump is setting too   
   much policy via executive orders  51% in the Pew assessment of his first   
   100 days [3]. Analysts and commentators warn that aggressive use of   
   executive power risks eroding norms; conservative think tanks and centrist   
   outlets alike have recorded anxieties about rapid, unconventional steps in   
   policy execution [3] [7].   
      
   3. Accusations of democratic erosion and a war on institutions   
      
   Opinion pieces argue Trumps second term has been marked by assaults on   
   democratic norms: The Guardians columnist lists actions  defying courts,   
   pardons for January 6 defendants, targeting judges and using agencies   
   against critics  as evidence the presidency is more lawless and more   
   authoritarian [4]. Other reporting echoes fears of institutional strain,   
   though sources differ on scale and inevitability [4].   
      
   4. Legal entanglements, immunity debates and the question of accountability   
      
   Commentators in outlets like The New York Times argue Trumps second term   
   intensifies concerns about corruption and the difficulty of prosecuting a   
   former president after 2029, underscoring a debate over immunity and future   
   accountability [8]. Available sources do not provide a legal verdict but   
   highlight expert views that prosecution could be unlikely [8].   
      
   5. Electoral strategy that critics call subversion of future contests   
      
   Longform analysis in The Atlantic warns that moves this termcoercing firms,   
   investigating officials, questioning limits of free speech and hinting at   
   termlimit changescould be aimed at undermining fair future elections and   
   even preparing a run for a third term [9]. That framing is forwardlooking   
   and contested; other pieces emphasize political calculation rather than   
   inevitable collapse [9].   
      
   6. Policy moves that alienate allies and reshape foreign posture   
      
   Reporting and summaries indicate a shift in foreign policy tone and   
   alliances that some view as damaging: analysts cite embrace of autocratic   
   leaders and undercutting support for Ukraine, and the Wikipedia summary   
   catalogues controversial foreign actions [4] [10]. Supporters argue such   
   moves are deliberate realignment; critics see geopolitical risk [4] [10].   
      
   7. Domestic policy shocks with political costs   
      
   Observers note shockandawe tactics in early 2025 that energized supporters   
   but produced backlashes: poor offyear election results, economic anxiety   
   among voters, and intraparty rebellions over scandals are highlighted as   
   signs the approach has costs [11]. Polling shows voters cite affordability   
   and shutdowns in lowering approval [2].   
      
   8. Social and educational disruptions tied to immigration and schools   
      
   Official White House messaging claims steep drops in foreign student   
   enrollment and immigrant populations tied to tougher policies; the   
   statement cites a 17% fall in new foreign students and a decline of about   
   2.23 million foreignborn residents since January 2025 [12]. Those figures   
   are presented by the administration as successes; critics note the   
   downstream effects on universities and K12 systems [12].   
      
   9. Deep polarization and mixed public expectations   
      
   Pew and YouGov polling document a sharply divided public: Republicans   
   mostly back the agenda while Democrats overwhelmingly oppose it, and large   
   shares of Americans express little confidence in Trumps respect for   
   democratic values [13] [5]. That polarization amplifies the political cost   
   of controversial actions [13] [5].   
      
   10. Conflicting interpretations: disaster narrative vs. deliberate   
   disruption   
      
   Commentators like The Guardian and The Atlantic frame the second term as   
   perilous and potentially the worst in history, emphasizing democratic risks   
   [4] [9]. Other analyses, including official White House material and some   
   policy watchers, portray the same moves as intentional policy realignment   
   and accomplishments for supporters   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)