Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.sys.mac.advocacy    |    Steve Jobs fetishistic worship forum    |    120,746 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 119,126 of 120,746    |
|    -hh to CrudeSausage    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IMKjMjIwIOKAmGZvciBhIGN1dC    |
|    13 Dec 25 16:55:03    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com              On 12/13/25 07:22, CrudeSausage wrote:       > On 2025-12-12 11:11 p.m., Alan wrote:       >> On 2025-12-12 18:36, CrudeSausage wrote:       >>> On 2025-12-12 8:18 p.m., Alan wrote:       >>>> On 2025-12-12 16:56, CrudeSausage wrote:       >>>>> On 2025-12-12 3:20 p.m., Alan wrote:       >>>>>> ...etc...       >>>>>> Are Apple's storage upgrade prices really "ridiculous"?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> No, they aren't.       >>>>>       >>>>> Here in Canada, I changed the 1TB nvme in my laptop to a 2TB one       >>>>> supporting OPAL hardware encryption for $175. It's actually       >>>>> increased in price to $255 now because of issues with memory chips.       >>>>> Meanwhile, upgrading the 512GB on the highest end MacBook Air to a       >>>>> 2TB nvme would cost me $900. I have no choice but to do it at       >>>>> purchase because Apple doesn't allow me to change the storage after       >>>>> I've received the machine.       >>>>>       >>>>> That is ridiculous, especially since there is _no_ speed advantage       >>>>> to using what Apple sells.              Hmmm...reviews in years past illustrated otherwise; my recollection is       that Apple has employed RAID 0 SSD boot drives, which is why my 3+yr old       Mac's SSD benchmarks at ~5,500MB/sec R/W, despite its then-current PCIe       3.0 x4 tech whose bandwidth limit is ~3,500 MB/s.                     >>>>> I'm sure that you'll defend this practice of theirs, but I consider       >>>>> their pricing to be ridiculous and many YouTubers voicing their       >>>>> opinion on the matter share my opinion.       >>>>       >>>> I'm not defending the practice.       >>>>       >>>> I'm pointing out that it's what EVERY company does.       >>>       >>> You might be right. Either way, it is a disgusting practise. People       >>> should reject any hardware company which provides too little storage       >>> for the era, which demands exorbitant prices for upgrades or doesn't       >>> allow future upgrades.       >>       >> "People should"?       >>       >> People do what they feel is in their best interest.       >>       >> People LIKE laptops that are as thin as possible and that means       >> integrating components.       >>       >> No one is forcing them to buy.       >       > Yes, people should. The more people disregard that Apple prevents them       > from upgrading, fixing their machines and getting a respectable amount       > of storage for the time period, the more Apple will double down on the       > ripoff. As it is, Apple is benefiting from the fact that customers are       > looking for an alternative to Windows and enjoy the Apple experience,       > especially if they own other Apple products.              Or...its that Apple has an obligation to their Stockholders /s                     > However, it's just a matter       > of time before people realize that they can get the 20-hour battery life       > from much less expensive Snapdragon laptops, that they can get double       > the storage and RAM by paying a few hundred less and that for the       > equivalent price of an Apple laptop that can probably play a card game       > or two, they can get a capable gaming machine.              Assuming that Microsoft finally does a good job with MS-Windows on ARM,       and gets their software vendors to follow with compiling native Apps.              > Additionally, instead of       > the seven years an Apple laptop lasts, a decent PC machine can easily       > last a decade, especially since manufacturers are not routinely       > soldering components to the motherboard the way Apple does.              Wish that was the case, because I've lost some Dell laptops from swollen       batteries at <3 years life: it doesn't do much good to have upgradable       RAM/SSD designs when the office IT Department then won't even touch       replacing a battery: they just replace the whole kit 'n kaboodle with       new, reimage it to set it up & migrate user data. Ditto for broken       smartphones too.                     -hh              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca