XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration   
   From: jda@none.here   
      
   Yes.  Trump is a rapist.   Worse than any Somalian immigrant.  He's also a   
   convicted felon 35 times over.   
      
      
   A civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean   
   Carroll and for defaming her, awarding Carroll $5 million; judges and   
   appeals courts later described Carroll’s rape allegation as “substantially   
   true” and that $5 million judgment was upheld on appeal [1] [2]. Dozens of   
   women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct over decades; several   
   lawsuits alleging rape or attempted rape have been filed or refiled in   
   courts, but criminal convictions for rape have not been reported in the   
   available sources [1] [3] [4].   
      
   1. Court finding versus criminal guilt — what the law and reporting say   
      
   Civil courts operate on the lower “preponderance of the evidence” standard,   
   not the criminal “beyond a reasonable doubt” threshold. A New York civil   
   jury in Carroll’s case found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation   
   and awarded $5 million; judges have characterized Carroll’s specific rape   
   allegation as “substantially true,” and that civil judgment was upheld on   
   appeal [2] [1]. Available sources do not report a criminal conviction for   
   rape of Donald Trump [5] [6].   
   You get the facts without the spin   
      
   Factually is independent and ad-free because people like you choose to   
   support it. If you find it useful, consider supporting it. You are not just   
   donating money. You are helping preserve a place that values facts and   
   truth.   
   Join Kristine Woodall, Steve, Dee and 321 others who check for themselves   
      
   2. Multiple allegations across decades — pattern or disparate claims   
      
   Reporting and timelines compiled by news outlets and reference sources   
   document allegations from at least the 1970s through the 1990s and later,   
   including claims of groping, forcible kissing, attempted rape, and rape; E.   
   Jean Carroll’s allegation is among the most detailed and litigated [3] [7]   
   [5]. Sources note that “at least 25 women” have made accusations ranging   
   from harassment to assault, and some plaintiffs have pursued civil suits or   
   public complaints [1] [3].   
      
   3. New and refiled lawsuits — recent developments to watch   
      
   Courthouse News reported a recent refiled federal complaint by a plaintiff   
   who alleges rape at age 13 at a private sex party, indicating new or   
   revived legal actions continue to surface [4]. These filings are separate   
   civil complaints and reflect ongoing litigation; outcomes and evidentiary   
   findings vary by case and are still developing in the courts [4].   
      
   4. How reporters and courts have characterized “rape” in these matters   
      
   Different sources show variation in language: some plaintiffs and prior   
   statements (including an ex-wife’s earlier comment) used the word “rape” in   
   ways that were later softened or described in non-criminal terms; courts in   
   Carroll’s civil case were tasked with applying specific New York legal   
   definitions and found liability for sexual abuse rather than a criminal   
   rape verdict in the jury’s deliberations, though judges later described   
   parts of Carroll’s account as “substantially true” [7] [2] [5].   
      
   5. Conflicting claims and denials — the other side   
      
   Trump and his lawyers have consistently denied the allegations, called   
   certain claims “categorically untrue,” and pursued counter-litigation,   
   arguing errors of law or factual disputes; his legal team has appealed   
   civil rulings and sought higher-court review [6] [2]. Reporting also   
   documents instances where alleged accusers rephrased or clarified their   
   words over time, and courts have had to sort those factual disagreements   
   [7] [2].   
      
   6. Public and political context — why these cases matter beyond the   
   courtroom   
      
   The Carroll verdict and other allegations have political and historical   
   significance: they fed media coverage, influenced public debate about   
   character and fitness for office, and have been cited by opponents and   
   supporters in political contexts [5] [8]. Sources show the verdict prompted   
   legal follow-ups, settlements, appeals, and continued reporting that keeps   
   the issue in public view [2] [1].   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)