XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 12/15/25 18:53, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   > On 12/15/25 6:16 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >> On 12/15/25 17:55, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   >>> On 12/15/25 5:08 PM, Alan wrote:   
   >>>> On 2025-12-13 18:29, pothead wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2025-12-14, rbowman wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 16:55:03 -0500, -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Wish that was the case, because I've lost some Dell laptops from   
   >>>>>>> swollen   
   >>>>>>> batteries at <3 years life: it doesn't do much good to have   
   >>>>>>> upgradable   
   >>>>>>> RAM/SSD designs when the office IT Department then won't even touch   
   >>>>>>> replacing a battery: they just replace the whole kit 'n kaboodle   
   >>>>>>> with   
   >>>>>>> new, reimage it to set it up & migrate user data. Ditto for broken   
   >>>>>>> smartphones too.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I was happy to see that the refurbished Lenovo T480 laptop I   
   >>>>>> bought allows   
   >>>>>> for cutting off the charging before the battery is completely full   
   >>>>>> and   
   >>>>>> that there is a Linux cli utility to set the charge parameters.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Lenovo is one of the best.   
   >>>>> Indestructable, business grade laptop designed to travel with you   
   >>>>> and keep working despite abuse.   
   >>>>> Make sure to keep the fan free from dust.   
   >>>>> Typical of most laptops.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And to get that level of quality, you PAY for it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And people who pay it don't get accused of being "brainwashed", nor   
   >>>> is Lenovo accused of "extorting" them.   
   >>>   
   >>> If I wanted a laptop, Lenovo would be a good choice, though. Apple   
   >>> would be an expensive choice.   
   >>   
   >> Back in my Thinkpad era, the IBM ones were running close to $3K, and   
   >> Lenovo was $2-2.5K. In today's dollars, that's quite a bit more.   
   >>   
   >> Migrated then to Dell and these were still ballpark $1.5K but they'd   
   >> die every 3 years (if you were lucky), so a lifespan similar to the   
   >> 'Pads was still $3-4K.   
   >>   
   >> Meantime, that Mac laptop that went seven years was $1350 (under $200/   
   >> yr), and last year's replacement for it (APMCX14LLA) was only $1800.   
   >> Bottom line is better lifecycle cost versus their business PC   
   >> equivalents that I've used...   
   >>   
   >> ...vastly better than my second to last Dell, a Latitude 7280 (i7 dual   
   >> core Koby Lake @ 2.8GHz; 16GB RAM & 256GB SSD) which ran ~$1500, but   
   >> lasted less than 3 years before its battery ballooned ($500+/yr).   
   >   
   >   
   > Looking at Lenovo's choices of laptops, they are crazy expensive. Not   
   > necessarily as brazenly extorting as Apple, but bad.   
      
   I had a couple of Thinkpads which cost the same or more as my   
   counterpart Mac laptops.   
      
   > Competitive pricing matters, IMO, when I can get by so well with this PC   
   made in China.   
      
   Sure, within the relevant market sphere: one doesn't try to compare the   
   price of a basic PC to a 'power user' one, just as one wouldn't say that   
   a motorscooter is cheaper than a bus while ignoring how many people each   
   can respectively transport.   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|