XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: ukmanchU@uke.ork   
      
   Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
      
   > On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote   
   > :   
   >   
   >> On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   >>> On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote   
   >>> :   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:   
   >>>>> "Roy S."    
   >>>>> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025   
   >>>>> 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all   
   >>>>> fake' routine.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png   
   >>>   
   >>> Seems reasonable.   
   >>   
   >> I think so.   
   >>   
   >>>> The link they gave:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> *IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a   
   >>>> case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is   
   >>>> true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.   
   >>>   
   >>> Wait? It does? What is the case?   
   >>   
   >> Your divorce.   
   >>   
   >>>> I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide   
   >>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.   
   >>>   
   >>> It is odd that it would be location based.   
   >>   
   >> I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?   
   >   
   > At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.   
      
   Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest   
   piece of shit.   
   And you could have prevented it by not stacking one lie on top of another   
   thus continuing the accusations and further proof that you are a liar.   
   But then you wouldn't receive the attention from others and that's what   
   you desire so keep digging your own hole deeper and deeper.   
      
   > Yes. I was divorced. Carroll claimed it was initiated by my ex. The   
   > site shows I am the one who filed (though she then responded by filing   
   > against me, which was weird, and the two cases were folded into one).   
      
   It doesn't matter as the person filing first has some advantages as well   
   as some disadvantages. The dates show you were the one, but a very short   
   time frame, to file first.   
   Big deal.   
   You were the person arrested, not your wife.   
      
   > To get people to look at the site, Carroll and others lied about MANY   
   > things tied to all sorts of charges that they say magically /   
   > illegally went away.   
      
   You keep telling that same lie snit. Why is that?   
   It's been explained to you many times that public sites don't keep   
   information forever but those records do not go away and can be obtained   
   from the court clerk.   
   Your arrest was dismissed, so of course it is no longer on the site.   
   You can't convince anyone by repeating the same lies over and over again.   
      
      
   > Does not work that way.   
      
   And nobody claimed it does.   
   You keep making that up.   
      
   > When busted, Carroll   
   > blamed some clerk saying it was an error... but then still blamed me!   
      
   He like others presented opinions of what might, or was most likely to   
   have happened.   
   You are the only one who doesn't seem to grasp that concept.   
      
      
   > Time to let this whole doxxing business just die.   
      
   As posted many time you have posted some quite libelous and nasty   
   lies about others and I don't blame them for exposing a low life, dirtbag   
   like you.   
   At this point I don't believe that even an apology from you would change   
   things.   
      
   > But it is an attack avenue so they never will. Ten years from now they   
   >will still be   
   > attacking with these lies.   
      
   Maybe if you stopped telling porkies about people they would ignore you?   
   But it's never your fault is it?   
   It's always the other person who is at fault.   
      
   Oh, and just so you know, the Nevada court system has the same process   
   for obtaining court records.   
   It is a little more expensive though.   
      
      
      
   --   
   Roy Scheinberg.   
   To learn all about the snit Michael Glasser Troll   
   simply use a free trial to newshosting.com and you   
   can download all messages back to 2004.   
   Some late 2000's messages are mixed in there as well.   
   Instant database.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)